1983
DOI: 10.2307/2801905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weaving, Writing and Gender

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These perspectives highlight March’s (1983, p. 743) logic of gender as a symbolic system –
to represent things that are, and are not, the same; things that might be the same if they were not interpreted from opposing perspectives; perspectives that emerge as opposed because they arise as women and men consider the gender logic of each other’s position; men and women who, as they consider one another, confront the many ways in which they are, and are not, the same.
…”
Section: Generational Change: Educating Girlsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These perspectives highlight March’s (1983, p. 743) logic of gender as a symbolic system –
to represent things that are, and are not, the same; things that might be the same if they were not interpreted from opposing perspectives; perspectives that emerge as opposed because they arise as women and men consider the gender logic of each other’s position; men and women who, as they consider one another, confront the many ways in which they are, and are not, the same.
…”
Section: Generational Change: Educating Girlsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Before going on to describe further the exact nature of the shift taking place in education in Ludigaun, it is important to contextualise this shift as a process that has moved from one embedded in local relationships to one that is at once, and murkily, both embedded and disembedded from them. March’s (1983) analysis of the ‘gender symbols’ of weaving and writing among the Tamang of Nepal is valuable for thinking about how the older generation of men of Ludigaun are positioned in relation to the older generation of women in the village due to their education and literacy, and also for how they are positioned as Bahun (and politically authoritative) for the same reasons in wider society. March (1983, p. 730) argues that gender is a symbolic system, ‘a system of beliefs about the world’ and weaving and writing amongst the Tamang are symbols that at once highlight a gendered division of labour and gendered subjectivities, as well as political authority.…”
Section: Embedded and Disembedded: Identity Construction And Gender Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 This is more a function of the nature of Tibetan ritual reading/recitation itself than of these particular men's lack of training; see, for example, March (1983). 20 These are 'speech acts' without an intentional speaker.…”
Section: Codamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Others include lamaic horoscopes, blockom mane padhme hum mani stones along village pathways. These written words exert considerable power to coerce or persuade supernatural beings to act in the interests of their human petitioners (see Holmberg 1989;March 1983;Mumford 1989;Ortner 1978) (Figure 4). …”
Section: Tibetan-language Literacy: the Gompa (Buddhist Temple)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Tamang people are categorised as ‗marginalised indigenous' people as recognised by the Nepal Federation of Indigenous Nationalities (NEFIN) (Bhattachan et al, 2018) as of now. However, they face many stereotypes as the eater of dead cows (March, 1983), eating beef co-signs as a lower order of humanity (Campbell, 1998) and the term -Bhote‖ (Zemach-Bersin, 2005). The economic mobility limitation as to ‗Pipa' during the Rana regime, no access to military and need to serve as bonded laboursas menial labourers for the rulers.…”
Section: Positions Of Tamang People In Nepali Societymentioning
confidence: 99%