Web-Based Comprehensive Information System for Self-Management of Diabetes Mellitus

Noh, Junghyun; Cho, Young-Jung; Nam, Hong-Woo; Kim, Jung-Han; Kim, Dong‐Jun; Yoo, Hye-Sook; Kwon, Young-Woo; Woo, Mi-Hye; Cho, Jae-Won; Hong, Myeong-Hee; Yoo, Joo-Hwa; Gu, Min-Jeong; Kim, Soon-Ai; An, Kyungeh; Jang, Soo-Mi; Kim, Min Jung; Yoo, Hyung-Joon

doi:10.1089/dia.2009.0122

Cited by 82 publications

(82 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…164,166,168,171,178 We also include in Table 5 a systematic review by Liang et al 173 and a Cochrane review. 174 The systematic review included 22 trials.…”

Section: Review Of Evidence For the Efficacy Of Mobile Technologybasementioning

confidence: 99%

Current Science on Consumer Use of Mobile Health for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention

Burke¹,

Ma²,

Azar³

et al. 2015

Circulation

488

389

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A lthough mortality for cardiovascular disease (CVD) has declined for several decades, heart disease and stroke continue to be the leading causes of death, disability, and high healthcare costs. Unhealthy behaviors related to CVD risk (eg, smoking, sedentary lifestyle, and unhealthful eating habits) remain highly prevalent. The high rates of overweight, obesity, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); the persistent presence of uncontrolled hypertension; lipid levels not at target; and the ≈18% of adults who continue to smoke cigarettes pose formidable challenges for achieving improved cardiovascular health.1,2 It is apparent that the performance of healthful behaviors related to the management of CVD risk factors has become an increasingly important facet of the prevention and management of CVD. 3In 2010, the American Heart Association (AHA) made a transformative shift in its strategic plan and added the concept of cardiovascular health.2 To operationalize this concept, the AHA targeted 4 health behaviors in the 2020 Strategic Impact Goals: reduction in smoking and weight, healthful eating, and promotion of regular physical activity. Three health indicators also were included: glucose, blood pressure (BP), and cholesterol. On the basis of the AHA Life's Simple 7 metrics for improved cardiovascular health, <1% of adults in the United States follow a healthful eating plan, only 32% have a normal body mass index, and > 30% have not reached the target levels for lipids or BP. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data revealed that people who met ≥6 of the cardiovascular health metrics had a significantly better risk profile (hazard ratio for all-cause mortality, 0.49) compared with individuals who had achieved only 1 metric or none.2 The studies reviewed in this statement targeted these behaviors (ie, smoking, physical activity, healthful eating, and maintaining a healthful weight) and cardiovascular health indicators (ie, blood glucose, lipids, BP, body mass index) as the primary outcomes in the clinical trials testing mobile health (mHealth) interventions.eHealth, or digital health, is the use of emerging communication and information technologies, especially the Internet, to improve health and health care 4 (Table 1). mHealth, a subsegment of eHealth, is the use of mobile computing and communication technologies (eg, mobile phones, wearable sensors) for health services and information.4,5 mHealth technology uses techniques and advanced concepts from an array of disciplines, for example, computer science, electrical and

show abstract

“…164,166,168,171,178 We also include in Table 5 a systematic review by Liang et al 173 and a Cochrane review. 174 The systematic review included 22 trials.…”

Section: Review Of Evidence For the Efficacy Of Mobile Technologybasementioning

confidence: 99%

Current Science on Consumer Use of Mobile Health for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention

Burke¹,

Ma²,

Azar³

et al. 2015

Circulation

488

389

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Some studies only presented changes of HbA1c and in this case HbA1c values in different intervention periods and endpoint were calculated correspondingly based on baseline and changes of values [8,16,[18][19][20]. For studies that provided standard error (SE) rather than SD, SD value was deduced based on SE value [12,[21][22][23].…”

Section: Data Extraction and Quality Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of the 28 studies included, 9 were conducted in the United States [11,12,19,20,22,25,28,30,31], 7 in the Republic of Korea [7,8,21,23,26,27,37], 2 in Poland [29,36] and Italy [16,35] respectively and 1 in China [34], Japan [33], Finland [18], Turkey [10], Canada [9], Spain [24], Norway [14] and England [32] each. Included studies were published between 2004 and 2016 and the intervention duration ranged from 6 weeks to 5 years.…”

Section: Characteristics Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…7 studies used web-based interventions solely [7,9,10,12,21,29,34], 6 used mobile technology [14,18,24,27,33,36] and 5 used the combination of both [8,26,30,31,37]. 10 studies utilized other forms of new media, including portable digital assistant, tablet computer and data transmission equipment only [11,16,19,20,22,23,25,28,32,35].…”

Section: Characteristics Of Interventionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, there is not a universally acknowledged verdict on whether new media interventions could make a significant difference on patients' glycemic level. Some research reported that compared with usual care, new media interventions could significantly reduce HbA1c levels in patients with type 2 diabetes [7][8][9][10][11] while others reported otherwise [12][13][14][15][16]. Therefore, in order to comprehensively evaluate the overall impact of new media interventions, a meta-analysis is needed to achieve the pooled result.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Effectiveness of Internet-Based Interventions on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (Preprint)

Shen¹,

Wang²,

Zhang³

et al. 2017

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND The popularity of internet as an area of research has grown manifold over the years. Given its rapid development and increasing coverage worldwide, internet-based interventions seem to offer a promising option to ameliorate huge burdens brought by type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, studies conducted by different researchers have provided contradictory results on the effect of internet-based interventions in glycemic control. OBJECTIVE This meta-analysis aims to summarize currently available evidence and evaluate the overall impact of internet-based interventions on glycemic management of type 2 diabetic patients. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science. Randomized controlled trials that used glycosylated hemoglobin values as the outcome measure of glycemic control were considered. Risk of bias and publication bias were evaluated. RESULTS Of the 492 studies, 35 were included in meta-analysis, and results indicated that the weighted mean difference (WMD) between usual care and internet-based interventions at endpoint was –0.426% (95% CI –0.540 to –0.312; P<.001). Subgroup analyses revealed that intervention duration ≤3 months yielded optimal performance (WMD –0.51%; 95% CI –0.71 to –0.31; P<.001). Combined mobile and website interventions were substantially superior to solely Web-based and mobile-based interventions in glycemic control (combined WMD –0.77%, 95% CI –1.07 to –0.47; P<.001; Web only: WMD –0.48%; 95% CI –0.71 to –0.24, P<.001; mobile only WMD –0.31%, 95% CI –0.49 to –0.14; P<.001). Furthermore, the effect of interventions with automated feedbacks was similar to those with manual feedbacks, and studies with internet-based educational contents were more effective in glycemic control. The assessment revealed a low risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, utilization of internet-based intervention is beneficial for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and taking full advantage of this type of intervention may substantially reduce the incidence of complications and improve quality of life. CLINICALTRIAL International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42017058032; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=58032 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6yY7eQNHr)

show abstract

Computer-based diabetes self-management interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Pal

Eastwood

Michie

et al. 2013

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

282

247

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Web-Based Comprehensive Information System for Self-Management of Diabetes Mellitus

Cited by 82 publications

References 14 publications

Current Science on Consumer Use of Mobile Health for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention

Current Science on Consumer Use of Mobile Health for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention

Effectiveness of Internet-Based Interventions on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (Preprint)

Computer-based diabetes self-management interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About