Web-Based Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Well-being: Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial

Abstract

Background Mindfulness can improve overall well-being by training individuals to focus on the present moment without judging their thoughts. However, it is unknown how much mindfulness practice and training are necessary to improve well-being. Objective The primary aim of this study was to determine whether a standard 8-session web-based mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) program, compared with a brief 3-session mindfulness intervention, improved overall participant well-being. In addition, we sought to explore whether the treatment effects differed based on the baseline characteristics of the participants (ie, moderators). Methods Participants were recruited from 17 patient-powered research networks, web-based communities of stakeholders interested in a common research area. Participants were randomized to either a standard 8-session MBCT or a brief 3-session mindfulness training intervention accessed on the web. The participants were followed for 12 weeks. The primary outcome of the study was well-being, as measured by the World Health Organization—Five Well-Being Index. We hypothesized that MBCT would be superior to a brief mindfulness training. Results We randomized 4411 participants, 3873 (87.80%) of whom were White and 3547 (80.41%) of female sex assigned at birth. The mean baseline World Health Organization—Five Well-Being Index score was 50.3 (SD 20.7). The average self-reported well-being in each group increased over the intervention period (baseline to 8 weeks; model-based slope for the MBCT group: 0.78, 95% CI 0.63-0.93, and brief mindfulness group: 0.76, 95% CI 0.60-0.91) as well as the full study period (ie, intervention plus follow-up; baseline to 20 weeks; model-based slope for MBCT group: 0.41, 95% CI 0.34-0.48; and brief mindfulness group: 0.33, 95% CI 0.26-0.40). Changes in self-reported well-being were not significantly different between MBCT and brief mindfulness during the intervention period (model-based difference in slopes: −0.02, 95% CI −0.24 to 0.19; P=.80) or during the intervention period plus 12-week follow-up (−0.08, 95% CI −0.18 to 0.02; P=.10). During the intervention period, younger participants (P=.05) and participants who completed a higher percentage of intervention sessions (P=.005) experienced greater improvements in well-being across both interventions, with effects that were stronger for participants in the MBCT condition. Attrition was high (ie, 2142/4411, 48.56%), which is an important limitation of this study. Conclusions Standard MBCT improved well-being but was not superior to a brief mindfulness intervention. This finding suggests that shorter mindfulness programs could yield important benefits across the general population of individuals with various medical conditions. Younger people and participants who completed more intervention sessions reported greater improvements in well-being, an effect that was more pronounced for participants in the MBCT condition. This finding suggests that standard MBCT may be a better choice for younger people as well as treatment-adherent individuals. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03844321; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03844321

Effectiveness of Web-Based Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Patients With Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

“…Website-based MBIs may offer more content, functionality, and instruction than app-based interventions, which may enhance user engagement, learning, and practice of positive thinking skills [ 67 , 68 ]. Website-based MBIs had higher completion rates and lower attrition rates compared to app-based interventions, which may be due to factors such as convenience, accessibility, engagement, and personalization [ 69 ]. Finally, in our review, a website-based study [ 41 ] that greatly improved FCR and stress highlighted the sustainability and self-management of the intervention and enabled flexible navigation by accessing website content according to user preferences.…”

Mixed-Mode Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for psychological resilience, Self Esteem and Stigma of patients with schizophrenia: a randomized controlled trial

“…Advancements in science and technology have enabled the exploration of more convenient self-help MBCT courses, shifting away from traditional face-to-face interactions. While online self-help mindfulness-based interventions have shown health benefits [ 22 , 23 ], they are limited by the absence of supervision, therapist participation, and group discussions. Mixed-mode mindfulness-based courses, combining “face-to-face” group therapy and “self-help” elements, provide enhanced convenience, cost-effectiveness, and reduced personnel investments compared to traditional courses.…”

Maintaining Engagement in Adults with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 to Use the iCanCope Mobile Application (iCanCope-NF)

“…In addition, users are able to personalize and tailor the content to meet their special needs. Additional benefits of mobile applications can include: improving scalability, cost-effective delivery, providing real-time convenience, and alternatives to the barriers required to access trained professionals [ 30 , 31 , 32 ]. Given the high preponderance of individuals having access to smartphone use, digital interventions have shown initial promise as a precursor, adjunct, and/or replacement for in-person treatment [ 32 ].…”

“…Additional benefits of mobile applications can include: improving scalability, cost-effective delivery, providing real-time convenience, and alternatives to the barriers required to access trained professionals [ 30 , 31 , 32 ]. Given the high preponderance of individuals having access to smartphone use, digital interventions have shown initial promise as a precursor, adjunct, and/or replacement for in-person treatment [ 32 ]. However, the psychosocial treatment methods employed in apps tend not to include empirically validated treatment modalities [ 33 , 34 ], which may lead to poor or even adverse patient outcomes [ 35 , 36 ].…”