On the basis of single-channel currents recorded from the muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR), we have recently hypothesized that the conformation adopted by the glutamate side chains at the first turn of the pore-lining α-helices is a key determinant of the rate of ion permeation. In this paper, we set out to test these ideas within a framework of atomic detail and stereochemical rigor by conducting all-atom molecular dynamics and Brownian dynamics simulations on an extensively validated model of the open-channel muscle AChR. Our simulations provided ample support to the notion that the different rotamers of these glutamates partition into two classes that differ markedly in their ability to catalyze ion conduction, and that the conformations of the four wild-type glutamates are such that two of them "fall" in each rotamer class. Moreover, the simulations allowed us to identify the mm (χ 1 ≅ -60°; χ 2 ≅ -60°) and tp (χ 1 ≅ 180°; χ 2 ≅ +60°) rotamers as the likely conduction-catalyzing conformations of the AChR's selectivity-filter glutamates. More generally, our work shows an example of how experimental benchmarks can guide molecular simulations into providing a type of structural and mechanistic insight that seems otherwise unattainable.nicotinic receptor | glutamate rotamers T he role an ion channel can play in the physiology of a cell is dictated by the rate at which ions permeate, the type of ions that permeate, the stimulus that gates the channel open, the rates of interconversion among all conductive and nonconductive conformations, and the channel's level of expression in the membrane. In this paper, we are concerned with the chemical determinants of the rate at which cations permeate through the muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR), an archetypal neurotransmitter-gated ion channel.Several "rings" of negatively charged residues decorate the walls of the ion-permeation pathway of the muscle nicotinic AChR. Of these, it is the ring of four glutamates and one glutamine in the first (N-terminal) turn of the pore-lining M2 transmembrane α-helices (the "intermediate ring of charge" at position -1′; Fig. 1A) that lowers the energetic barrier to cation permeation the most (1). Recently, on the basis of single-channel currents recorded from mutant AChRs, we proposed that only two of the four glutamates in the ring contribute to set the size of the unitary currents, and that these glutamates are deprotonated even at pH 6.0 (2). This is in stark contrast with the situation in voltage-dependent Ca 2+ channels (Ca V channels) and cyclicnucleotide-gated channels (CNG channels), for example, where all four selectivity-filter glutamates have been suggested to contribute (directly or indirectly) to the formation of one (in Ca V channels) or two (in CNG channels) proton-binding sites that are largely protonated at pH 6.0 (3, 4). Moreover, our results led us to propose that the difference between the muscle-AChR glutamates that catalyze cation permeation and those that do not is the conformation adopte...