2018 IEEE Intl Conf on Parallel &Amp; Distributed Processing With Applications, Ubiquitous Computing &Amp; Communications, Big 2018
DOI: 10.1109/bdcloud.2018.00133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Web Service Recommendation Based on Word Embedding and Topic Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Functional characteristics-based Web services recommendation mainly explores the matching of functional similarity between user requirement and services, ranks and recommends services based on the degree of matching [3][4][5][6][7]. Among them, some researchers utilize the TF-IDF (Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency) algorithm to extract the similarity between service texts (e.g., WSDL functional descriptions), and map the semantic information of service documents into a dense vector space.…”
Section: Functional Characteristics Based Web Services Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Functional characteristics-based Web services recommendation mainly explores the matching of functional similarity between user requirement and services, ranks and recommends services based on the degree of matching [3][4][5][6][7]. Among them, some researchers utilize the TF-IDF (Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency) algorithm to extract the similarity between service texts (e.g., WSDL functional descriptions), and map the semantic information of service documents into a dense vector space.…”
Section: Functional Characteristics Based Web Services Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mainly include the methods based on functional features, non-functional features, and hybrid features. Functional-based service recommendation focuses on the matching of functional similarity between user requirements and services, ranking and recommending services based on the degree of matching [3][4][5][6][7]. Researchers have adopted various approaches to achieve this goal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most works use the dataset from Pro-grammableWeb, and they exploit different kinds of auxiliary information, including functional descriptions, tags, categories, providers, architectural styles, etc., as the mashupservice composition record is extremely sparse. Based on the modeling of the mashup-service composition record, existing research can be roughly divided into three categories: neighbor-based collaborative filtering (CF) methods [11][12][13][14][15], latent factor-based CF methods [6,[16][17][18][19][20][21] and deep learning-based methods [8,9,[22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [22], Zhang et al cluster the descriptions of services using Doc2Vec and use the DeepFM model [30] to mine the higher-order composition relations. In [23], Chen et al also adopt the DeepFM model by taking the features learned from word embedding and the Dirichlet mixture model (DMM) as input. In [8], Cao et al propose an attention FM [31] by employing an attention mechanism that learns the importance of each input feature interaction via a neural network model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%