2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-2012-1_34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Web Service Response Time Prediction Using HMM and Bayesian Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and . We can get MVU(a us4 ) = 3 + 0.478 × (18 − 9) × (3/9)/0.478 = 6 by formula (7). Because the actual value is 9, the prediction accuracy is .…”
Section: B the Densification Of User-item Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and . We can get MVU(a us4 ) = 3 + 0.478 × (18 − 9) × (3/9)/0.478 = 6 by formula (7). Because the actual value is 9, the prediction accuracy is .…”
Section: B the Densification Of User-item Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They predict dynamic QoS of composite service by a probabilistic model and graph reduction algorithm. In addition, Markov model and Bayesian networks are used in the study of [7] for service modeling and response time prediction. However, these solutions are only suitable for QoS prediction of composite service but unsuitable for individual component service.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metric for response time of web services is still a topic of concern for researchers. Various researchers use Hidden Markov Model (HMM), Knowledge Base and Bayesian Network for prediction of response time of web service components [25]. Response time can be estimated directly through observer agent services/applications which can log response time directly.…”
Section: Response Timementioning
confidence: 99%