2008
DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfn066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Web Survey Methods: Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
121
0
11

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
5
121
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The Internet provides both a platform for the administration of online surveys (Couper, & Miller, 2008;Kraut et al, 2004;Riva, Teruzzi, & Anolli, 2003) and a tool for acquiring more diverse research participants. As tools for survey administration and participant recruitment are developed, however, researchers must be careful to evaluate the validity of these novel approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Internet provides both a platform for the administration of online surveys (Couper, & Miller, 2008;Kraut et al, 2004;Riva, Teruzzi, & Anolli, 2003) and a tool for acquiring more diverse research participants. As tools for survey administration and participant recruitment are developed, however, researchers must be careful to evaluate the validity of these novel approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Survey is the preferred type of data collection for the study due to the economy of the design and the rapid turnaround in data collection (Copuer & Mille, 2008;Lindhjen & Navrud, 2011). The chosen design provides a quantitative representation of behavior and opinions through sampling of a population (Couper & Mille, 2008;Creswell, 2009). …”
Section: Study Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although an electronic version was available, it was not used in the snowball process because of doubts about its operation with various browsers. In addition, lower response rates (Sen and Bricka 2009), and higher rates of drop out behavior and item non-response are reported for online instruments (Heerwegh and Loosveldt 2008;Couper and Miller 2008; for problems with online surveys on personal networks see Matzat and Snijders, 2010). Given these issues, we decided to keep high technology in the lab and use low technology in the field (Hogan 2007).…”
Section: [Insert Figure 42 Here] Figure 42: Name Generatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%