2003
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.38.1.55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weed Control in Strawberry Provided by Shank- and Drip-applied Methyl Bromide Alternative Fumigants

Abstract: The loss of methyl bromide (MB) as a soil fumigant has created the need for new weed management systems for crops such as strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa Duchesne). Potential alternative chemicals to replace methyl bromide fumigation include 1,3-D, chloropicrin (CP), and metam sodium. Application of emulsified formulations of these fumigants through the drip irrigation system is being tested as an alternative to the standard shank injection method of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was regardless of application variables and confirms previous reports that InLine readily diffuses beyond the wetted area 3. However, nutsedge was not controlled on the bed shoulders, regardless of application variable, confirming previous results from California 16. Nutsedge required higher doses of InLine than root‐knot and other plant‐parasitic nematodes, which were controlled over the entire bed width in Tifton.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This was regardless of application variables and confirms previous reports that InLine readily diffuses beyond the wetted area 3. However, nutsedge was not controlled on the bed shoulders, regardless of application variable, confirming previous results from California 16. Nutsedge required higher doses of InLine than root‐knot and other plant‐parasitic nematodes, which were controlled over the entire bed width in Tifton.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Nevertheless, mixtures of 1,3‐D and chloropicrin do not control weeds as well as methyl bromide–chloropicrin, and additional herbicides are required if weeds become a problem 5, 13. Given the high activity of methyl isothiocyanate against weeds, metam has been tested in combination with 1,3‐D and chloropicrin for broad‐spectrum pest control 14–17. However, simultaneous or combined application of metam with these halogenated fumigants did not show the expected synergy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The poor ability of methyl isothiocyanate to diffuse laterally at effective concentrations from the point of application results in reduced efficacy against target pests 17–19, 24, 25. Furthermore, the data demonstrate significantly higher concentrations of methyl isothiocyanate and longer residence time with soil depth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In the absence of methyl bromide, alternative fumigants that possess all the properties of methyl bromide;7 methyl isothiocyanate, 1,3‐dichloropropene and chloropicrin, are the most promising alternatives. As such they are widely used for a number of target pests and diseases,8, 20, 27, 28 either alone or in combinations with other alternatives 24, 29–33. These chemicals have lower vapor pressures than methyl bromide, so they are primarily distributed in the soil bed by water movement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%