2005
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2005.23.16_suppl.5528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weekly docetaxel (D) and irinotecan (I) in patients (pts) with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer (HNC): A phase II trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of phase II studies with combination cytotoxic regimens for the second-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic SCCHN have also reported MSTs inferior to that observed in the current study, including a MST of 4.5 months among 48 patients treated with vinorelbine, methotrexate, and bleomycin, 4 and a MST of 4.9 months among 35 patients treated with docetaxel and irinotecan. 7 The MST in the current study also compares favorably with that reported in the phase II study of cetuximab (Erbitux, ImClone Systems, Inc.; a monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor) that led to the Food and Drug Administration approval of cetuximab monotherapy for recurrent/ metastatic SCCHN after failure of platinum-based therapy. One hundred three patients with platinum-refractory recurrent/metastatic SCCHN were treated with single-agent cetuximab, with an objective response rate of 13%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of phase II studies with combination cytotoxic regimens for the second-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic SCCHN have also reported MSTs inferior to that observed in the current study, including a MST of 4.5 months among 48 patients treated with vinorelbine, methotrexate, and bleomycin, 4 and a MST of 4.9 months among 35 patients treated with docetaxel and irinotecan. 7 The MST in the current study also compares favorably with that reported in the phase II study of cetuximab (Erbitux, ImClone Systems, Inc.; a monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor) that led to the Food and Drug Administration approval of cetuximab monotherapy for recurrent/ metastatic SCCHN after failure of platinum-based therapy. One hundred three patients with platinum-refractory recurrent/metastatic SCCHN were treated with single-agent cetuximab, with an objective response rate of 13%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…3 Data on the efficacy of chemotherapy in metastatic/recurrent SCCHN after failure of platinum-based therapy are limited, but response rates have been reported to range from 3% to 27%, with MST less than 6 months. [3][4][5][6][7] There is a great need for new and improved treatment options for this patient population, and current research efforts are focusing on molecularly targeted therapies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 The outcome of previously treated patients is even worse because chemotherapy is generally ineffective in this setting, with response rates of less than 10% and median survival of about five months. 7 The identification of novel agents with activity in both previously untreated and pretreated patients is particularly warranted in incurable SCCHN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accrual is ongoing (15). Interest in irinotecan for the treatment of HNC patients has increased with the introduction of targeted agents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%