The Lunyu 論語 (Analects of Confucius), Daodejing 道德經 (Classic of the Way and Virtuosity) or Laozi 老子 (Book of Master Lao), and the Zhuangzi 莊子 (Book of Master Zhuang) have been broadly classified as representative of Confucianism (Lunyu) and Daoism (Laozi and Zhuangzi). This loose grouping, and the similarities and differences associated with these "schools" include some of the most telling and simultaneously misleading generalizations about Chinese philosophy or thought in general. These articles seek to provide an overview of the relationship between Confucianism and Daoism. The first article begins before with a generalized topics based comparison of the Lunyu, Laozi and Zhuangzi. The latter two texts include their own significant differences, but I will, wherever possible, look for generalities that fit both. The major themes considered in this first part are (1) the perspectives on names (ming 名) and actualities (shi 實), (2) cultivation, learning, and what is considered natural (ziran 自然), and finally (3) conceptions of the person. 1 | INTRODUCTION In the pre-Buddhist formative years for "Chinese Philosophy" several texts emerged as key contributions to what would become a lasting tradition. The Han and Wei-Jin periods, which arguably saw the beginning of the commentarial style that would dominate the development of philosophical and religious ideas in China until today, ushered in the dominating influence of the Yijing 易經 (Book of Changes), Lunyu 論語 (Analects of Confucius), Daodejing 道德經 (Classic of the Way and Virtuosity) or Laozi 老子 (Book of Master Lao), and the Zhuangzi 莊子 (Book of Master Zhuang). The latter three texts, Lunyu, Laozi, and Zhuangzi, were broadly classified by thinkers such as Wang Bi 王弼 (226-249)-who was following earlier depictions already found in Mohist texts and the Xunzi 荀子