2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weibull and lognormal Taguchi analysis using multiple linear regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, since there were no vibration data in rms 2 in the engineering handbooks used, more research is necessary in this area. If the fatigue exponent is known, it can be incorporated in the Weibull analysis in the derived over‐stress factor. It should be noticed here that the Weibull stress shape parameter and the Weibull fatigue shape parameters are related as in Equation . On the other hand, it is important to mention that if the time Weibull family W ( β t , η t ) or the stress Weibull family W ( βs , ηs ) are determined based on several stress variables, then the Taguchi method given in can be used to determine the corresponding Weibull parameters. Finally, it should be considered for further research that because n in Equation is the reciprocal of the cumulative risk function H ( t ), and since H ( t ) is the mean of the related non‐homogeneous Poisson processes, referred to in literature as the Weibull process (see Rinne section 4.2.6, page 199), then it seems possible, by setting the H ( t ) value as the critical cumulated damage, to use Equation to estimate the n expected shocks of the related additive cumulative damage model defined in Nakagawa; however, more research should be undertaken in this area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, since there were no vibration data in rms 2 in the engineering handbooks used, more research is necessary in this area. If the fatigue exponent is known, it can be incorporated in the Weibull analysis in the derived over‐stress factor. It should be noticed here that the Weibull stress shape parameter and the Weibull fatigue shape parameters are related as in Equation . On the other hand, it is important to mention that if the time Weibull family W ( β t , η t ) or the stress Weibull family W ( βs , ηs ) are determined based on several stress variables, then the Taguchi method given in can be used to determine the corresponding Weibull parameters. Finally, it should be considered for further research that because n in Equation is the reciprocal of the cumulative risk function H ( t ), and since H ( t ) is the mean of the related non‐homogeneous Poisson processes, referred to in literature as the Weibull process (see Rinne section 4.2.6, page 199), then it seems possible, by setting the H ( t ) value as the critical cumulated damage, to use Equation to estimate the n expected shocks of the related additive cumulative damage model defined in Nakagawa; however, more research should be undertaken in this area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9. On the other hand, it is important to mention that if the time Weibull family W (β t , η t ) or the stress Weibull family W (βs, ηs) are determined based on several stress variables, then the Taguchi method given in 26 can be used to determine the corresponding Weibull parameters. 10.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, since in Equation , only η is unknown, then it should also be possible to estimate η on the basis of n . Fortunately, from Equation and Piña et al, the n value that holds with the given R(t) , t , and β values is given by n=1ln[],R(),t. …”
Section: Weibull Sample Size Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, the Weibull family, which the PCIs shall represent is W(3, 4356.388). Therefore, since in Equation 14, only η is unknown, then it should also be possible to estimate η on the basis of n. Fortunately, from Equation 15 and Piña et al, 17 the n value that holds with the given R(t), t, and β values is given by…”
Section: Weibull Sample Size Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Eqn (5), n is the sample size to be tested, which based on R(t) (see Piña et al 11 Section 3.3.1), is given by…”
Section: Weibull and Process Parameter Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%