2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weibull modulus from size effect of high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete under compression and flexure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For common concrete, the toughness in compression is much higher than the toughness in tension or flexure, and this can be attributed as concrete being strong under compressive loading but weak under tensile loading. With T c ranging from 46.92 to 77.88 MPa.% , the compressive toughness of the steel-slag concrete was lower than that of high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete about 1.5-3 times [34], and lower than that of ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete about 5-8 times [40]. Both Poisson's ratio and modulus of elasticity (MPa) were material parameters characterizing elastic performance.…”
Section: Dependence Of Compressive Strength On Testing Age Of Steel-smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For common concrete, the toughness in compression is much higher than the toughness in tension or flexure, and this can be attributed as concrete being strong under compressive loading but weak under tensile loading. With T c ranging from 46.92 to 77.88 MPa.% , the compressive toughness of the steel-slag concrete was lower than that of high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete about 1.5-3 times [34], and lower than that of ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete about 5-8 times [40]. Both Poisson's ratio and modulus of elasticity (MPa) were material parameters characterizing elastic performance.…”
Section: Dependence Of Compressive Strength On Testing Age Of Steel-smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this law, the strength of brittle material is not constant, it is size-dependent: strength of a small specimen would be comparatively higher than that of a large specimen. The statistical approach of size effect can be visibly explained by a model of chain under tension and a model of brick stack under compression, as illustrated in Figure 10 [34]. According to these models, the large specimens have more elements thus, have a higher probability of defect elements resulting in breakdown [32].…”
Section: Statistical Approach About Size Effect On Compressive Strengmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the materials science literature, there is only one study on Bayesian interval estimation for the Weibull modulus: Simoa et al [50] proposed a new Bayesian method for determination of strength and crack growth using fatigue data from previous tests as prior information. The remaining studies in materials science are generally based on point estimation of for multiple purposes, such as investigating size effect of materials under different operational conditions [51] or understanding the statistical behavior of the strength of materials [52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…0.85-0.95 and is lower for lower strength concrete. The scale effect in the case of normal-weight concrete of different types-plain, ordinary, self-compacting, high strength and ultra-high strength (reactive powder concrete), fiber reinforced-was proven in numerous studies, e.g., [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. There are two general conclusions resulting from this research concerning normal-weight concrete: (1) the higher the concrete strength, the lesser the scale effect; (2) the specimen slenderness is the crucial parameter determining the scale effect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%