2019
DOI: 10.3390/universe5050102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weighing Cosmological Models with SNe Ia and Gamma Ray Burst Redshift Data

Abstract: Many models have been proposed to explain the intergalactic redshift using different observational data and different criteria for the goodness-of-fit of a model to the data. The purpose of this paper is to examine several suggested models using the same supernovae Ia data and gamma-ray burst (GRB) data with the same goodness-of-fit criterion and weigh them against the standard Lambda cold dark matter model (ΛCDM). We have used the redshift—distance modulus (z − μ) data for 580 supernovae Ia with 0.015 ≤ z ≤ 1… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As → 0, both the above expressions, Equations (39) and (40), tend to unity, i.e., the universe was strongly curved in the past. By taking Ω 0 = Ω ,0 = 0.63 from Table 1 for Equation (39), and Ω 0 = Ω ,0 = 9.0 × 10 −5 from Table 5.2 in reference [7], we get radiation density equal to matter density at ≈ 7000, which is determined by the relation: It should be mentioned that we are not trying to determine which model fits the SNe 1a data best, as this has already been done in an earlier paper [28] Our attempt is to determine the u parameter of the curvature by fitting the data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…As → 0, both the above expressions, Equations (39) and (40), tend to unity, i.e., the universe was strongly curved in the past. By taking Ω 0 = Ω ,0 = 0.63 from Table 1 for Equation (39), and Ω 0 = Ω ,0 = 9.0 × 10 −5 from Table 5.2 in reference [7], we get radiation density equal to matter density at ≈ 7000, which is determined by the relation: It should be mentioned that we are not trying to determine which model fits the SNe 1a data best, as this has already been done in an earlier paper [28] Our attempt is to determine the u parameter of the curvature by fitting the data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The Matlab curve fitting tool was used to fit the data by minimizing χ 2 and the latter was used for determining the corresponding χ 2 probability P [36]. Here χ 2 is the weighted summed square of residual of µ:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to assess clearly the goodness-of-fit in each category and make them comparable between categories, we decided to use the normalization method introduced in a recent paper [36]. The method is as follows:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3: Numerical values from the Union 2.1 compilation + the "Hymnium" GRBs sample of χ 2 , χ 2 red and Q, where k stands for the number of parameters. The extension of the Hubble diagram to the GRBs, as an example, has been implemented in [17,11,18,19,20].…”
Section: Cardassian Cosmologymentioning
confidence: 99%