1998
DOI: 10.2307/2694700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weighing vs. Counting: Measurement Reliability and the California School of Midden Analysis

Abstract: The California School of Midden Analysis represents a long-standing tradition of using weight, rather than minimum number of individuals (MNI), to analyze shell recovered from archaeological sites in California. This method originated at the University of California, Berkeley, in the early twentieth century and continues to the present, in spite of the advent of counting measures such as MNI and NISP (number of identified specimens) in faunal studies. We argue that MNI estimates are more reliable than weight a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
12

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
48
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…both weights and MNIs has attracted criticism with discussion mostly focused on the validity of such approaches in providing unambiguous measures for the representation of taxa within a given assemblage (see Waselkov, 1987;Erlandson, 1994;Mason et al, 1998;Álvarez et al, 2011;Faulkner, 2011;Habu et al, 2011;Rick and Waselkov, 2015). Glassow, however, stated that "neither MNI nor weight proportions, is a universal unit of analysis for addressing the various questions about human predation on shellfish that archeologists frequently ask" (Glassow, 2000, p. 412).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…both weights and MNIs has attracted criticism with discussion mostly focused on the validity of such approaches in providing unambiguous measures for the representation of taxa within a given assemblage (see Waselkov, 1987;Erlandson, 1994;Mason et al, 1998;Álvarez et al, 2011;Faulkner, 2011;Habu et al, 2011;Rick and Waselkov, 2015). Glassow, however, stated that "neither MNI nor weight proportions, is a universal unit of analysis for addressing the various questions about human predation on shellfish that archeologists frequently ask" (Glassow, 2000, p. 412).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results suggest that for each excavation level MNI and weight are strongly correlated and therefore provide comparable results. While MNI and weight measurements both have their strengths and weaknesses for shell analysts (see Mason et al 1998;Glassow 2000;Claassen 1998;, we have chosen to use MNI for the analyses in this study. While shell weights can be useful for certain types of analysis, they may be problematic when modeling the potential impact of predation on populations of prey species.…”
Section: Shellfish Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite Claassen's (1998:45) obvious lack of confidence in the applicability of the criteria in demonstrating human impact on population sizes and the alteration of demographics, some or all of them have nevertheless been generally accepted within the archaeological community more or less as benchmarks against which data can be evaluated (e.g. Allen 2012; Braje et al 2007;Faulkner 2006Faulkner , 2009Faulkner , 2013Giovas et al 2010;Giovas et al 2013;Grayson et al 2001;Jerardino 1997;Jerardino et al 1992;Mannino and Thomas 2002;Mason et al 1998;Mason et al 2000;Nagaoka 2002;Whitaker 2008). …”
Section: Molluscs As Indicators Of Human Behaviour and Environmental mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are ongoing debates about the most appropriate method for quantifying molluscan remains (e.g. Claassen 1998Claassen , 2000Giovas 2009;Glassow 2000;Lyman 2008;Mannino and Thomas 2001;Mason et al 1998;Mowat 1994;Nunn et al 2007;Poteate and Fitzpatrick 2013;Reitz and Wing 2008), this combination is frequently used in faunal studies both in Australia and internationally, as it is able to more accurately describe the proportions of taxa, the degree of inter-site and intra-site fragmentation, and also provides comparisons with non-molluscan components (see e.g. Faulkner 2013:73;Szabó 2009;Ulm 2006).…”
Section: Marine Molluscsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation