2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2021.02.474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing pain may reflect different pain mechanisms in knee osteoarthritis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use Egger tests to evaluate publication bias. When the P value < 0.05, the result is considered statistically significant [ 17 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use Egger tests to evaluate publication bias. When the P value < 0.05, the result is considered statistically significant [ 17 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weight-bearing pain has been described as more likely to reflect biochemical mechanisms triggered by tissue damage leading to nociceptive pain, 4 , 5 , 11 whereas the pathology of non–weight-bearing pain continues to be poorly understood. It has been hypothesized to arise as a neuroplastic response to the chronicity of nociceptive input from the subchondral bone marrow lesions 2 albeit this hypothesis has been challenged in a recent experimental study 1 suggesting the etiology of non–weight-bearing pain could be more complex and potentially at least partly due to a proinflammatory response to tissue damage. The middle range of the VAS scale, ie, 20 to 80 (0–100 scale) correlated poorly to the WOMAC pain scale overall, suggesting that the complicated cognitive abstraction required in scoring pain in the intermediate range contributed to this finding, although the potential explanations for this observation were not possible to study in the current data set.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%