Weight change among people randomized to minimal intervention control groups in weight loss trials

Abstract

ObjectiveEvidence on the effectiveness of behavioral weight management programs often comes from uncontrolled program evaluations. These frequently make the assumption that, without intervention, people will gain weight. The aim of this study was to use data from minimal intervention control groups in randomized controlled trials to examine the evidence for this assumption and the effect of frequency of weighing on weight change.MethodsData were extracted from minimal intervention control arms in a systematic review of multicomponent behavioral weight management programs. Two reviewers classified control arms into three categories based on intensity of minimal intervention and calculated 12‐month mean weight change using baseline observation carried forward. Meta‐regression was conducted in STATA v12.ResultsThirty studies met the inclusion criteria, twenty‐nine of which had usable data, representing 5,963 participants allocated to control arms. Control arms were categorized according to intensity, as offering leaflets only, a single session of advice, or more than one session of advice from someone without specialist skills in supporting weight loss. Mean weight change at 12 months across all categories was −0.8 kg (95% CI −1.1 to −0.4). In an unadjusted model, increasing intensity by moving up a category was associated with an additional weight loss of −0.53 kg (95% CI −0.96 to −0.09). Also in an unadjusted model, each additional weigh‐in was associated with a weight change of −0.42 kg (95% CI −0.81 to −0.03). However, when both variables were placed in the same model, neither intervention category nor number of weigh‐ins was associated with weight change.ConclusionsUncontrolled evaluations of weight loss programs should assume that, in the absence of intervention, their population would weigh up to a kilogram on average less than baseline at the end of the first year of follow‐up.

Screening and brief intervention for obesity in primary care: a parallel, two-arm, randomised trial

“…Results from a meta-analysis of general population cohorts suggests that people who are obese lose 300 g a year in the course of normal living 25 . On average, individuals in who only received this advice lost more than 1 kg, which is typical of a population motivated to lose weight 29 . Other data from our trial also suggest that physician's advice motivated patients and prompted action.…”

Biases in obesity research: Identify, correct, endorse, or abandon effort?

“…Three insightful papers in this issue (1)(2)(3) highlight different types of biases and errors in obesity research and related fields of investigation. George et al (1) review a wide variety of errors and biases in misuse of statistical methods, misconceptions in scientific inference, improper or inadequate consideration of multiplicity, and suboptimal or selective reporting.…”

“…George et al (1) review a wide variety of errors and biases in misuse of statistical methods, misconceptions in scientific inference, improper or inadequate consideration of multiplicity, and suboptimal or selective reporting. Johns et al (2) provide a metaepidemiological assessment of data from control groups from 29 randomized trials of obesity and show that participants in inactive control groups spuriously seem to lose weight after 12 months-an extra reason why non-controlled studies should be less trusted. Fontaine et al (3) discuss the subtleties of placebo effects and how placebo-related factors may cause an effect even among people who know that they are receiving a placebo.…”

Assessment of a Zumba® Fitness Class in Hospital Workers

“…A systematic review by Johns and colleagues (2016), shown that uncontrolled evaluations of weight loss programs, in the absence of any intervention, would present a reduction of one kilogram or less at the end of the first year [17]. Our results were obtained from health employees without any nutritional plan or diet.…”