2003
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-31802003000400002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weight-for-length relationship at birth to predict neonatal diseases

Abstract: Weight-for-length adequacy and weight/length index alone, without the knowledge of gestational age, were able to identify newborns at risk for some selected neonatal diseases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although age and gender are the primary criteria used to assess the anthropometric measurements of particular children, evaluation of weight with reference to LH (WLH), instead of age (weight for age) is proposed to make a significant contribution in diagnosing FTT in infancy and early childhood (2,3,4,5). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although age and gender are the primary criteria used to assess the anthropometric measurements of particular children, evaluation of weight with reference to LH (WLH), instead of age (weight for age) is proposed to make a significant contribution in diagnosing FTT in infancy and early childhood (2,3,4,5). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the fact that LH is a denominator in the calculation of BMI, age-adjusted BMI calculation may not be specific for the discrimination of lean or body fat mass (2,3,4,5). Stature-dependent BMI in different periods has the potential for variation by the relative leg length and sitting height to different directions (4,12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Newborns with indices below the 10 th percentile have a greater frequency of diseases, such as neonatal asphyxia, respiratory distress syndrome, metabolic disorders, severe hyperbilirubinemia, sepsis, congenital pneumonia, among other perinatal disorders (1) . In spite of the fact that the calculation of the index does not consider the gestational age (GA) but only the weight and length at birth, it is noted that those NB identified as having a low index present a greater frequency of diseases specific of preterm (PT) infants and of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants, and the NB with high indices have a greater frequency of diseases that affect large-for-gestational-age (LGA) neonates (1) . The association between birth length and GA is more intense and shows less variation than the relation between birth weight and GA (1)(2)(3)(4) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the fact that the calculation of the index does not consider the gestational age (GA) but only the weight and length at birth, it is noted that those NB identified as having a low index present a greater frequency of diseases specific of preterm (PT) infants and of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants, and the NB with high indices have a greater frequency of diseases that affect large-for-gestational-age (LGA) neonates (1) . The association between birth length and GA is more intense and shows less variation than the relation between birth weight and GA (1)(2)(3)(4) . On the other hand, neonates with lower weight/length ratio indices reflect NB with smaller fat deposits, and can be considered thin NB (1,(5)(6)(7) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%