1996
DOI: 10.1016/0038-0717(96)00121-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weight gain and weight loss of the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris L. at different temperatures and body weights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are aware of only one study that has investigated the development time of L. terrestris under field conditions (Lakhani and Satchell 1970). Butt et al (1994) found that the time to maturity for L. terrestris hatchlings under optimal laboratory conditions was 30 weeks, while Daniel et al (1996) found L. terrestris grown at 20°C reached maturity in about 10 weeks. These development times are much shorter than the 2 years we used to estimate production by Lumbricus spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We are aware of only one study that has investigated the development time of L. terrestris under field conditions (Lakhani and Satchell 1970). Butt et al (1994) found that the time to maturity for L. terrestris hatchlings under optimal laboratory conditions was 30 weeks, while Daniel et al (1996) found L. terrestris grown at 20°C reached maturity in about 10 weeks. These development times are much shorter than the 2 years we used to estimate production by Lumbricus spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although there is no way to definitively confirm that earthworm loss was due to mortality rather than escape, there are several reasons to suggest that mortality was the likely explanation. First, earthworms in the stockpiled soil treatment experienced substantial weight loss and some disappearance, suggesting that these were unfavourable conditions for the persistence of this species (Daniel et al, 1996). If earthworms were vacating pots on the basis of unfavourable conditions, this should also have been observed in the stockpile treatment, but earthworm loss was insignificant in that treatment compared to Happy Valley soil.…”
Section: Earthworm Mortality and Biomassmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Particularly, it is well known that temperature changes the development and reproductive rate of earthworms (Reinecke 1981). In addition, it was also mentioned that for E. fetida, which lives in compost manure heaps and is subject to decompositional warming, an ideal temperature for adequate survival and cocoon production is within 20-25°C (Presley et al 1996;Daniel et al 1996); then, according to the environmental conditions, the trend of cocoon production continues to a point beyond which the thermal limit of the species is breached, leading to lower growth and reproduction and, as a consequence, a higher mortality (Reinecke and Venter 1987). Thus, in the set of experiments, the variation of temperature (21.6-31°C) either affected the physiological parameters and vital rates (survival, growth and reproduction) or can provoke the interaction with chemical pollutants to form chelants (Olugbenga et al 2008); i.e., important differences temperature regime strong affected population performance of the earthworms and consequently lead fluctuations negative modified biomass, maturity, reproduction and burrowing activity.…”
Section: First Stepmentioning
confidence: 98%