“…A total of 678 records underwent title and abstract screening after duplicates were removed. A total of 30 records were considered for full-text screening, and 18 were excluded for the following reasons: non-primary research ( n = 2) [ 14 , 15 ], wrong patient population ( n = 5, where the studies focused on neonates with physiological jaundice or with congenital anomalies) [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ], wrong study type ( n = 3, either case report or in vitro/animal studies) [ 21 , 22 , 23 ], and wrong study design ( n = 8, assessed wrong exposure, incorrect comparison groups or lack of formal comparison) [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ].…”