2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3402-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weight loss versus muscle loss: re-evaluating inclusion criteria for future cancer cachexia interventional trials

Abstract: Defining cancer cachexia by WL over time may be limited as it does not capture skeletal muscle loss. Cross-sectional CT body composition analysis may improve early detection of muscle loss and patient participation in future cancer cachexia clinical trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
31
0
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
31
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, even if accurate body weight data were available, it appears to be less sensitive for identifying cachexia than muscle loss in humans and likely in dogs. Of human patients with cancer that did not meet the inclusion criterion for cachexia of ≥5% weight loss, 41% had ≥5% muscle loss over the same period, suggesting that muscle loss is a more sensitive measure of cachexia …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, even if accurate body weight data were available, it appears to be less sensitive for identifying cachexia than muscle loss in humans and likely in dogs. Of human patients with cancer that did not meet the inclusion criterion for cachexia of ≥5% weight loss, 41% had ≥5% muscle loss over the same period, suggesting that muscle loss is a more sensitive measure of cachexia …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, weight loss has been used to identify patients with cancer who are at risk for malnutrition [ 4 , 5 ]. However, muscle loss occurs in patients who may not be losing weight; therefore, measures of specific body components are required [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]. Assessment of cancer related malnutrition aims to identify and measure metabolic derangements and muscle depletion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrepancy between number of patients being underweight and the number being sarcopenic highlights the need for the use of other parameters than BMI to assess the nutritional encounters. Using Body Mass Index (BMI) or weightloss as criteria for study inclusion may not be accurate in patients with cancer, since fluid imbalance will affect these parameters [24]. As well, it may be considered if the screening tool NRS 2002, originally developed for the use in hospitalized patients, is sufficiently accurate to identify the patients before the severe decrease in muscle mass or the decline in mGPS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%