2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11401-017-1096-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weighted compact commutator of bilinear Fourier multiplier operator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, together with (5.14) applied to m ∈ W s (R nm ) and (5.16), Corollary 1.4 with p Corollary 4]. On the other hand, by enlarging the range of p to the case p ≤ 1, Theorems 5.6 and 5.7 respectively refines the compactness on weighted Lebesgue spaces in [38] and [62,Theorem 2].…”
Section: Multilinear Fourier Multipliers Formentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accordingly, together with (5.14) applied to m ∈ W s (R nm ) and (5.16), Corollary 1.4 with p Corollary 4]. On the other hand, by enlarging the range of p to the case p ≤ 1, Theorems 5.6 and 5.7 respectively refines the compactness on weighted Lebesgue spaces in [38] and [62,Theorem 2].…”
Section: Multilinear Fourier Multipliers Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us present a result about the compactness of T m . Indeed, modifying the proof of [38,Theorem 1.1] to the m-linear case, we get that for every b ∈ CMO and for each j = 1, . .…”
Section: Multilinear Fourier Multipliers Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Hu [17] introduced another kind of bilinear maximal operators M 1 β and M 2 β which was defined by…”
Section: A Multilinear Maximal Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easy to find that the condition (a) holds because of the boundedness of [b, T δ ] 1 in Theorem 2. Now, we prove the condition (b) using some ideas in [17]. Let R > 0 be large enough such that supp b ⊂ B(0, R) and let A ≥ max(2R, 1), l be a nonnegative integer.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%