2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-75650-9_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weighted Factors for Evaluating Anonymity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to privacy concerns and the limited availability of the dataset on anonymous traffic, researchers often gather private data or generate traffic within simulated environments [17]. In response to this challenge, the authors introduced the Anon17 dataset, logging features associated with Tor and other anonymous network traffic instances [17]. These features encompass packet header information, packet counts, and the length in bytes of each flow.…”
Section: Detecting Tor Traffic By Supervised Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to privacy concerns and the limited availability of the dataset on anonymous traffic, researchers often gather private data or generate traffic within simulated environments [17]. In response to this challenge, the authors introduced the Anon17 dataset, logging features associated with Tor and other anonymous network traffic instances [17]. These features encompass packet header information, packet counts, and the length in bytes of each flow.…”
Section: Detecting Tor Traffic By Supervised Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance evaluation of some machine learning-and deep learning-based models displayed a high false positive rate in classifying Darknet traffic [13]. Moreover, due to the limited availability of public datasets, researchers have needed help accessing data about anonymous network traffic [17,18]. Consequently, training detection models can be challenging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rationally allocating the index weight has always been a hot spot in the study of evaluation researchers. The methods proposed until now have mainly included the subjective weight empowerment of experts [9, 10] and the objective weight‐empowerment method that extracts the index weight from index values [11, 12]. The first subject discussed in this paper is to find a more reasonable method of weight empowerment based on the comparison and analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the subjective and objective weight‐empowerment methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%