2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomphys.2018.09.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weighted Fano varieties and infinitesimal Torelli problem

Abstract: We solve the infinitesimal Torelli problem for 3-dimensional quasi-smooth Q-Fano hypersurfaces with at worst terminal singularities. We also find infinite chains of double coverings of increasing dimension which alternatively distribute themselves in examples and counterexamples for the infinitesimal Torelli claim and which share the analogue, and in some cases the same, Hodge-diagram properties as the length 3 Gushel-Mukai chain of prime smooth Fanos of coindex 3 and degree 10.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, as complete intersections in (weighted) projective spaces one finds only the cubic fourfold, see [PS18]. More examples are found if one allows terminal and Q-factorial singularities, see [FRZ19] but no new examples of IHS are produced anyway. In [FM18] we conjectured that even taking complete intersection in Grassmannian one does not get any new example other than a complete intersection with four linear hypersurfaces in the Grassmannian Gr(2, 8) and the above mentioned examples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, as complete intersections in (weighted) projective spaces one finds only the cubic fourfold, see [PS18]. More examples are found if one allows terminal and Q-factorial singularities, see [FRZ19] but no new examples of IHS are produced anyway. In [FM18] we conjectured that even taking complete intersection in Grassmannian one does not get any new example other than a complete intersection with four linear hypersurfaces in the Grassmannian Gr(2, 8) and the above mentioned examples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in the hypersurface case, the only vanishings that are not automatic are for H p, p (Y ). Indeed, using (9) and ( 10) one gets the division in even and odd case, similarly to what we did in Theorem 3.8. Moreover by Künneth formula, I p, p−1 (Y ) = I p, p−1 (G).…”
Section: Lemma 48 Hmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Some more examples are found if we allow mild singularities-e.g. cyclic quotientsee [9]. Most of these examples are deeply linked with hyperkähler geometry and derived category problems.…”
Section: Lemma 48 Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• hypersurfaces in projective space [7,11] • hypersurfaces in weighted projective space [39] • complete intersections in projective space [37,41,43] • zerosets of sections of vector bundles [16] • certain cyclic covers of a Hirzebruch surface [29] • complete intersections in certain homogeneous Kähler manifolds [28] • some weighted complete intersections [44] • certain Fano quasi-smooth weighted hypersurfaces [14] • elliptic surfaces [27] The methods used in many of these studies have in common that they describe the cohomology groups relevant for the infinitesimal Torelli map as components of a so-called Jacobi ring and argue that the map can be interpreted as multiplication by some element in this ring. We generalize this method to the case of quasismooth complete intersections in weighted projective space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%