2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2019.09.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weighted gradient estimates for elliptic problems with Neumann boundary conditions in Lipschitz and (semi-)convex domains

Abstract: Let n ≥ 2 and Ω be a bounded Lipschitz domain in R n . In this article, the authors investigate global (weighted) estimates for the gradient of solutions to Robin boundary value problems of second order elliptic equations of divergence form with real-valued, bounded, measurable coefficients in Ω. More precisely, let p ∈ (n/(n − 1), ∞). Using a real-variable argument, the authors obtain two necessary and sufficient conditions for W 1,p estimates of solutions to Robin boundary value problems, respectively, in te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we prove Theorem 1.7 via using a real-variable argument for (weighted) L p (Ω) estimates, which is inspired by the work of Caffarelli and Peral [18] (see also [58]). When Ω is a bounded Lipschitz domain in R n , the conclusion of Theorem 3.1 was essentially established in [54,Theorem 3.4] (see also [ [62,Theorem 3.1] are also valid in the case of bounded NTA domains. Thus, we omit the proof of Theorem 3.1 here.…”
Section: Several Notionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this section, we prove Theorem 1.7 via using a real-variable argument for (weighted) L p (Ω) estimates, which is inspired by the work of Caffarelli and Peral [18] (see also [58]). When Ω is a bounded Lipschitz domain in R n , the conclusion of Theorem 3.1 was essentially established in [54,Theorem 3.4] (see also [ [62,Theorem 3.1] are also valid in the case of bounded NTA domains. Thus, we omit the proof of Theorem 3.1 here.…”
Section: Several Notionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We prove Theorem 1.7 via using a (weighted) real-variable argument (see Theorem 3.1 below), which was essentially established in [54,Theorem 3.4] (see also [28,29,53,55,62]) and inspired by [18,58]. It is worth pointing out that a similar real-variable argument with the different motivation was used in [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another well-known space appeared in John and Nirenberg [23] is BMO (R n ), the space containing functions of bounded mean oscillation, which can be regarded as the limit space of JN con p,q (R n ) as p → ∞; see [19,Proposition 2.21] and also [31,Proposition 2.6]. The space BMO (R n ) has wide applications in harmonic analysis and partial differential equations; see, for instance, [2,11,12,14,15,16,17,25,28,34]. In particular, we refer the reader to [29] for a systematic survey on function spaces of John-Nirenberg type.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%