2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10998-010-1001-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weighted L p -conjecture for locally compact groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we will generalize the second result from [1] (cf. Remark from [1] and note that any discrete topological group is unimodular).…”
Section: Corollary 2 the Following Conditions Are Equivalentmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, we will generalize the second result from [1] (cf. Remark from [1] and note that any discrete topological group is unimodular).…”
Section: Corollary 2 the Following Conditions Are Equivalentmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…During the next 30 years this conjecture was established in special cases, and, finally, in 1990 Saeki [4] proved the L p -conjecture in its general form. In [1] the conjecture was strengthened for p > 2. Namely, it was shown that if G is not compact, then for every compact, symmetric neighbourhood of the neutral element K, there exist functions f, g ∈ L p such that for any x ∈ K, f g(x) = ∞.…”
Section: Dμ(y)mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the recent work [1], we proved that for 2 < p < ∞, the compactness of G is equivalent to the existence of f * g for all f, g ∈ L p (G); see [20], as well. We also showed that f * g exists for all f, g ∈ L p (G) if 1 < p < 2 and G is discrete, or p = 2 and G is unimodular.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is well-known that L 1 (G) is always closed under the convolution. Saeki [22] proved that, for 1 < p < ∞, the space L p (G) is closed under the convolution if and only if G is compact; see also Burnham [4], Crombez [6]- [7], Duggal [8], Gaudet [10], Johnson [12], Kunze [13], Lohoue [14], Milnes [15], Rajagopalan [16]- [19], Rickert [20]- [21], Urbanik [23], Zelazko [24]- [27] for some special cases, Kinani and Benazzouz [9] and also Abtahi, Nasr Isfahani and Rejali [2]- [3] for the more general case of weighted L p -spaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%