2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpaa.2009.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weighted limits in simplicial homotopy theory

Abstract: By combining ideas of homotopical algebra and of enriched category theory, we explain how two classical formulas for homotopy colimits, one arising from the work of Quillen and one arising from the work of Bousfield and Kan, are instances of general formulas for the derived functor of the weighted colimit functor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following proposition shows that the limit of any diagram of quasi-categories weighted by a projective cofibrant functor is again a quasi-category. The proof is very simple and indeed related conclusions have been drawn elsewhere; see for instance [8]. For the duration of this section and the next we shall assume that A is a small simplicial category.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The following proposition shows that the limit of any diagram of quasi-categories weighted by a projective cofibrant functor is again a quasi-category. The proof is very simple and indeed related conclusions have been drawn elsewhere; see for instance [8]. For the duration of this section and the next we shall assume that A is a small simplicial category.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Also, one can easily check that for each inclusion of a square-shaped diagram the map from the pushout of the upper left horn to the terminal vertex is a cofibration by iterated use of the pushout product axiom (cf Lemma 3.4.6 where essentially the same result is proven in more detail). The fact that the canonical map from |srpFq| Ñ colim F is a weak equivalence for projectively cofibrant A is Theorem B.1.2, which is a consequence of Theorems 3.2 and 3.3 in [21].…”
Section: Whitehead Towersmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Definition 3.4.2 If I ‚ is a cofibrant decreasingly filtered commutative monoid in C, X ‚ is a simplicial finite set, and E˚is a connective generalized homology theory on C, then by the topological Hochschild-May spectral sequence for X ‚b I ‚ we mean the spectral sequence obtained by applying E˚to the tower of cofiber sequences in C (21) . .…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our main sources are [12], [28], [30], [33], [34], [36], [52]. For simplicity, we restrict our discussion to pointed simplicial model categories, which is sufficient for our purposes.…”
Section: Coreflective Localizing Subcategoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%