2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-009-0659-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weighting of model results for improving best estimates of climate change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead we made use of a repository of existing runs of a global hydrological model forced by a multi-model ensemble of climate data for both a reference period and 2071-2100 projections. Comparable weighting methods have been applied for GCM ensemble averaging of precipitation and temperature (see Giorgi and Mearns, 2002;Räisänen et al, 2010), but applying the approach to discharge is new. By weighting the simulated discharge with discharge observations a multi-model ensemble analysis of climate change effects could be made for a particular location, in this case the lower Brahmaputra at Bahadurabad station.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead we made use of a repository of existing runs of a global hydrological model forced by a multi-model ensemble of climate data for both a reference period and 2071-2100 projections. Comparable weighting methods have been applied for GCM ensemble averaging of precipitation and temperature (see Giorgi and Mearns, 2002;Räisänen et al, 2010), but applying the approach to discharge is new. By weighting the simulated discharge with discharge observations a multi-model ensemble analysis of climate change effects could be made for a particular location, in this case the lower Brahmaputra at Bahadurabad station.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the 'ability of AOGCMs to reproduce different aspects of present-day climate' (Giorgi & Mearns 2002, p. 1142, as characterized in reanalysis data. Due to a lack of general consensus, there currently exist many different GCM performance measures, which can be classified as those including (1) a single and (2) several of the time-series characteristics relevant for climate modeling (Giorgi & Mearns 2002, Räisänen et al 2010). These are: climatological mean state (Randall et al 2007, Gleckler et al 2008, frequency of extreme events (Kharin & Zwiers 2000), seasonal cycle (Errasti et al 2010), low frequency variability (Benestad 2003, Santer et al 2008, and interannual variability (Gleckler et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, results of several studies showed that more reliable results are obtained by using projections of a cluster of better performing models or calculating a weighted ensemble average (Sperna Weiland et al 2012). In the weighted ensemble analysis, the individual GCM weights were derived from model performance and future ensemble convergence (Giorgi and Mearns 2002;Murphy et al 2004;Räisänen et al 2010). In this study, weights were determined by using the model performance, i.e., historical relationship between model outputs and observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%