2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2011.02531
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weinberg operator contribution to the nucleon electric dipole moment in the quark model

Nodoka Yamanaka,
Emiko Hiyama

Abstract: We evaluate the contribution of the CP violating gluon chromo-electric dipole moment (the so-called Weinberg operator, denoted as w) to the electric dipole moment (EDM) of nucleons in the nonrelativistic quark model. The CP-odd interquark potential is modeled by the perturbative one-loop level gluon exchange generated by the Weinberg operator with massive quarks and gluons. The nucleon EDM is obtained by solving the nonrelativistic Schroedinger equation of the three-quark system using the Gaussian expansion me… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
(144 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, let us derive an explicit constraint on the magnitude of the Weinberg operator from the presently available experimental data, given by the EDM of 199 Hg. According to our analysis, the EDM of 199 Hg is d Hg = w (µ = 1GeV) (−1.3 ± 0.96) × 10 −2 e MeV where the central value is given only by the contribution of the intrinsic neutron EDM and the error is obtained by the taking the quadrature of the theoretical uncertainty of the Weinberg operator contribution of the neutron EDM (60%) [98], the error associated with the nuclear level calculation (30%) [139], and the maximal value of the our Weinberg operator result (the second term of (5-18)), which we consider here to be a systematic error. Combined with the experimental result, d Hg (exp) < 7.4 × 10 −30 e cm [15], this leads to…”
Section: Ope For the Weinberg Operator Correlatormentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, let us derive an explicit constraint on the magnitude of the Weinberg operator from the presently available experimental data, given by the EDM of 199 Hg. According to our analysis, the EDM of 199 Hg is d Hg = w (µ = 1GeV) (−1.3 ± 0.96) × 10 −2 e MeV where the central value is given only by the contribution of the intrinsic neutron EDM and the error is obtained by the taking the quadrature of the theoretical uncertainty of the Weinberg operator contribution of the neutron EDM (60%) [98], the error associated with the nuclear level calculation (30%) [139], and the maximal value of the our Weinberg operator result (the second term of (5-18)), which we consider here to be a systematic error. Combined with the experimental result, d Hg (exp) < 7.4 × 10 −30 e cm [15], this leads to…”
Section: Ope For the Weinberg Operator Correlatormentioning
confidence: 88%
“…[60]. The second term stands for the irreducible term calculated in the quark model (d (irr) n ≈ −5 w e MeV) [98]. We explicitly see from the above equation that the nucleon EDM generated by w has no chiral suppression.…”
Section: Ope For the Weinberg Operator Correlatormentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2.2) at the hadronic scale to the electric dipole moments of the neutron d n , proton d p and mercury d Hg are computed with non-perturbative techniques of strong interactions at low energies. State-of-the art coefficients for the CEDMs and Weinberg operator have been obtained in the literature with QCD sum rules [46][47][48][49] and the quark model [50], while the contribution of the quark EDMs can be computed in lattice QCD [51][52][53][54][55], these having significantly smaller errors. Assuming a Peccei-Quinn mechanism, these read [56]…”
Section: Matching Onto Nuclear and Atomic Edmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lattice QCD calculations are limited by the fact that higher-dimensional operators mix with lower-dimensional ones of the same quantum numbers with power-divergent coefficients, requiring accurate nonperturbative treatment of the operator mixing [9]. Estimates using effective models of hadron structure such as the quark model [10] are uncertain because these models usually do not specify how the effective degrees of freedom match with the non-perturbative gluon fields of QCD. Methods based on QCD vacuum structure, such as the estimate of Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%