2016
DOI: 10.1163/18748929-00904006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Welcome to Interfaith Dialogue”, the Employee of the Art Gallery Said and Started the Tour – Frames and Spaces of Interfaith Interaction

Abstract: Considering the presence of interfaith activities outside the religious sphere, this paper raises the question of a correlation between space and interfaith interaction, and proposes an analytical scheme for the analysis of the spatiality of (interfaith) interaction. Using the example of an interfaith tour in the Hamburg Art Gallery and based on a spatial and interaction theory framework, the paper focuses on three dimensions in which space is expressed and correlated with interaction. First, is space as an el… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At times, interfaith dialogue helped participants learn about religious conflict (Acar, 2013); consider new perspectives and explore complexities within their own beliefs (Small, 2009); develop stronger commitments to their own, self-authored worldview (Mayhew, Rockenbach, & Bowman, 2016); or better understand similar yet different teachings across traditions (Charaniya & Walsh, 2001; Haug, 2014). Often, learning in interfaith dialogue was collaborative, open, respectful, and mutual (Boys & Lee, 1996; Gonzalez, 2011; Helskog, 2014a; Kalender, 2016; Krebs, 2015; Williams, 2019). But when members of interfaith dialogue did not feel safe and supported in the dialogue space, learning was not mutual, and dialogue became a way to dominate those in the minority (Riitaoja & Dervin, 2014).…”
Section: Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At times, interfaith dialogue helped participants learn about religious conflict (Acar, 2013); consider new perspectives and explore complexities within their own beliefs (Small, 2009); develop stronger commitments to their own, self-authored worldview (Mayhew, Rockenbach, & Bowman, 2016); or better understand similar yet different teachings across traditions (Charaniya & Walsh, 2001; Haug, 2014). Often, learning in interfaith dialogue was collaborative, open, respectful, and mutual (Boys & Lee, 1996; Gonzalez, 2011; Helskog, 2014a; Kalender, 2016; Krebs, 2015; Williams, 2019). But when members of interfaith dialogue did not feel safe and supported in the dialogue space, learning was not mutual, and dialogue became a way to dominate those in the minority (Riitaoja & Dervin, 2014).…”
Section: Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%