2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2017.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weldability, machinability and surfacing of commercial duplex stainless steel AISI2205 for marine applications – A recent review

Abstract: Graphical abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The alloying element Mo preferably stabilizes the ferrite phase, but its concentration is decreased in this phase in the FZ of the as-welded condition, due to the cooling conditions, not having time for diffusion in the ferrite phase and being part retained austenite. High cooling rates induced by the welding process leads to significant variation in the grain size, orientation and shape in the FZ microstructures when compared to BM, as also reported in previous studies 12 . The PWHT enabled the partitioning of the alloying elements and changed/modified 1.0; 1.1 and 0.9 to 1.1; 1.4 and 0.7 for chemical elements: Cr, Mo and Ni, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The alloying element Mo preferably stabilizes the ferrite phase, but its concentration is decreased in this phase in the FZ of the as-welded condition, due to the cooling conditions, not having time for diffusion in the ferrite phase and being part retained austenite. High cooling rates induced by the welding process leads to significant variation in the grain size, orientation and shape in the FZ microstructures when compared to BM, as also reported in previous studies 12 . The PWHT enabled the partitioning of the alloying elements and changed/modified 1.0; 1.1 and 0.9 to 1.1; 1.4 and 0.7 for chemical elements: Cr, Mo and Ni, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In these steels the ferrite presents a higher hardness than austenite because it contains higher Cr and Mo contents in its composition 12 and because its volumetric fraction was higher in the FZ before the PWHT and there was still a higher Ni absorption, the hardness tends to be higher in these regions. Moreover, BCC crystal (ferrite) structures have less slip systems than the crystalline FCC structure at room temperature 29 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In these tests, no clear incidents in vibration levels were identified, which could be associated with premature failure of the tools. This behavior shows that wear was progressive, throwing aside any speculation regarding the formation of a possible BUE, which was referred in [28,29]. Indeed, the wear and tear must have begun to occur on the coating, which deteriorated progressively, resulting in degradation of the substrate.…”
Section: Ph5740-s1 and S2 Tests (Cvd Tin/ticn/al 2 O 3 Coated Tools)mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In fact, the high tenacity presented by these alloys, high work hardening effect, low thermal conductivity, and strong tendency for the formation BUE, make processing these materials through chip-cutting machining difficult. In fact, the work hardening effect promotes friction between the cutting edge of the tool and the workpiece, constituting an additional source of heat in this area, inducing oxidation and diffusion phenomena [28,29]. On the other hand, persistent BUE formation and adhesive wear occur essentially due to the chemical/metallurgical affinity between the tool's material and the duplex stainless steel being machined, usually resulting in continuous chip formation, which is undesirable [30,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%