2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10644-015-9159-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Welfare gains from the adoption of proportional taxation in a general-equilibrium model with a grey economy: the case of Bulgaria’s 2008 flat tax reform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, steady state employment rate in Bulgaria is set to n = 0.533, as in Vasilev (2016a). Following Vasilev (2015b), h = 1/3. The values for ϕ 1 , ϕ 2 , ϕ 3 were taken as the point estimates from running a simple multivariate regression on the specification in Eq.…”
Section: Data and Model Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, steady state employment rate in Bulgaria is set to n = 0.533, as in Vasilev (2016a). Following Vasilev (2015b), h = 1/3. The values for ϕ 1 , ϕ 2 , ϕ 3 were taken as the point estimates from running a simple multivariate regression on the specification in Eq.…”
Section: Data and Model Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative weight attached to the utility out of leisure in the household's utility function, η, and the shirking detection probability d, can only be determined as a ratio, which would be calibrated to match χ. Following Vasilev (2015b), the hours worked per person h is set to one-third. Once the values of model parameters were obtained, the steady-state equilibrium system solved, the "big ratios" can be compared to their averages in Bulgarian data.…”
Section: Data and Model Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quarterly data on output, consumption and investment was collected from National Statistical Institute (2021), while the real interest rate is taken from Bulgarian National Bank Statistical Database (2021). The calibration strategy described in this section follows a long-established tradition in modern macroeconomics: first, as in Vasilev (2015b), the discount factor, β = 0.982, is set to match the steady-state capital-to-output ratio in Bulgaria, k/y = 13.964, in the steady-state Euler equation. The labor share parameter, 1 − α = 0.571, is obtained as in Vasilev (2015a), and equals the average value of labor income in aggregate output over the period 1999-2020.…”
Section: Data and Model Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, the relative weight attached to the utility out of leisure in the household's utility function, γ, is calibrated to match that in steady-state consumers would supply one-third of their time endowment to working. Next, the steady-state depreciation rate of physical capital in Bulgaria, δ = 0.013, was taken from Vasilev (2015b). It was estimated as the average quarterly depreciation rate over the period 1999-2020.…”
Section: Data and Model Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%