Welfare outcomes assessment in laying hen farm assurance schemes

Abstract

Most farm assurance schemes in the UK at least, in part, aim to provide assurances to consumers and retailers of compliance with welfare standards. Inclusion of welfare outcome assessments into the relevant inspection procedures provides a mechanism to improve animal welfare within assurance schemes. In this study, taking laying hens as an example, we describe a process for dealing with the practical difficulties in achieving this in two UK schemes; Freedom Food and Soil Association. The key challenges arise from selecting the most appropriate measures, defining sampling strategies that are feasible and robust, ensuring assessors can deliver a consistent evaluation and establishing a mechanism to achieve positive change. After a consultation exercise and pilot study, five measures (feather cover, cleanliness, aggressive behaviour, management of sick or injured birds, and beak trimming) were included within the inspection procedures of the schemes. The chosen sampling strategy of assessing 50 birds without handling provided reasonable certainty at a scheme level but less certainty at an individual farm level. Despite the inherent limitations within a time and cost sensitive certification assessment, the approach adopted does provide a foundation for welfare improvement by being able to highlight areas of concern requiring attention, enabling schemes to promote the use of outcome scoring as a management tool, promoting the dissemination of relevant technical information in a timely manner and increasing the scrutiny of standards important for the welfare of the birds.

Trends during development of Scottish salmon farming: An example of sustainable intensification?

“…19). This finding counters the common assumption that intensification com promises measures of animal welfare and supports the increasing pref erence for performance outcome measures over resource inputs for assessing farmed animal welfare (Main et al, 2012). Although it cannot be assumed that such performance measures do address all welfare concerns (Kristensen et al, 2012) increases in survival and growth strongly indicate improvements in health and meeting of dietary and environmental needs (Ellis et al, 2012).…”

A pilot survey of farm animal welfare in Serbia, a country preparing for EU accession

“…Training and extension programs to engage and better inform farmers of the practical and economic value of outcome results (Main et al . ) and understanding of the relationship between animal health, welfare and management inputs would also be beneficial.…”

Economic and Welfare Impacts of Providing Good Life Opportunities to Farm Animals

“…As per most noncaged farms in the UK, all sample farms were either a member of the RSPCA Assured (nonorganic) or Soil Association (organic) assurance schemes, which is an existing market requirement to ensure a price premium. Visits were made by five experienced scheme assessors and scheme advisors, all of whom were previously trained in the AssureWel outcome assessments for predominantly negative welfare [1]. Prior to data collection, they also attended an on-farm training session on the resource tier framework, during which the practicalities of flock assessment as well as the scoring criteria were discussed and standardised.…”

“…Certification schemes for animal-originated food products provide an effective means to assure consumers of the farm's compliance with welfare standards [1]. Traditionally founded on input-based assessment through measurements of resource provision [2,3] some recent programmes recognise the need for outcome-based assessment [4,5] and employ hybrid approaches that integrate information regarding on-farm resources, welfare outcomes and evidence of continuous improvement [6].…”