1988
DOI: 10.1093/0198248431.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Well-Being

Abstract: This book is about ideas at the centre of our thought about our individual lives and about society—‘well‐being’, ‘welfare’, ‘utility’, and ‘quality of life’. It aims to answer three questions: What is the best way to understand well‐being? to what extent can it be measured? what role should it play in moral and political thought? The book argues that the sharp contrast between reason and desire found in our modern intellectual tradition has hampered answers to those questions. The book first tries to describe … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For desire theorists, death is a harm because it deprives the individual of the satisfaction of future desires. Other philosophers say that certain goods are valuable irrespective of whether they are pleasurable or desired (Griffin 1986;Finnis 2011). In line with the so-called 'objective list' theory of well-being, death is bad because it deprives you of goods like relationships, achievements, knowledge, creative pursuits or, in the case of nonhuman animals, a species-typical life (Nussbaum 2004).…”
Section: The Deprivation Theory Of the Harm Of Deathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For desire theorists, death is a harm because it deprives the individual of the satisfaction of future desires. Other philosophers say that certain goods are valuable irrespective of whether they are pleasurable or desired (Griffin 1986;Finnis 2011). In line with the so-called 'objective list' theory of well-being, death is bad because it deprives you of goods like relationships, achievements, knowledge, creative pursuits or, in the case of nonhuman animals, a species-typical life (Nussbaum 2004).…”
Section: The Deprivation Theory Of the Harm Of Deathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, these preferences can be base or cultured, rich or superficial, and share a desire in utility to prevent pain and enhance pleasure. Their commonality is in hedonism, informed (having an appreciation of the nature of the objects of desire and its prudential impact (Griffin, 1988) or doxic. Their satisfaction can be achieved by a confluence of concepts that produce occurrent enjoyment or dispositional happiness (Davis, 1981;Haybron, 2009).…”
Section: Desire Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many accounts of harm. To give just some indication of the range of possible views, on some accounts whether a person suffers harm depends on his or her selfassessment, on other accounts the judgments of the individual's community matters, on other accounts whether someone is harmed depends on objective facts as to whether he or she can flourish as a human being ideally should (for an overview see Griffin 1986). The difference between these accounts can be seen clearly if one considers what they would say about a woman who has been rendered incapable of feeling sexual pleasure via female "circumcision".…”
Section: Value-laden Accountsmentioning
confidence: 99%