Handbuch Qualitative Videoanalyse 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-15894-1_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

„Well, it depends … “: Die mannigfaltigen Formen der Videoanalyse in der Qualitativen Sozialforschung. Eine Annäherung

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ethnomethodologically based video interaction analysis reconstructs the order of social interactions in the situation and focuses on both spoken language and nonverbal modalities. Depending on the research question and the topic of the research project, e.g., mimic, gestures, symbols, sounds, language, body posture are analyzed as elements of nonverbal and verbal interaction (Moritz, 2018) Within this study, the social interaction between patients, relatives and SLPs were studied to analyze the clinical decisionmaking processes that are routinely used in video-based telepractice in outpatient services. The various phases of data analysis were initially carried out by MB (first author).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ethnomethodologically based video interaction analysis reconstructs the order of social interactions in the situation and focuses on both spoken language and nonverbal modalities. Depending on the research question and the topic of the research project, e.g., mimic, gestures, symbols, sounds, language, body posture are analyzed as elements of nonverbal and verbal interaction (Moritz, 2018) Within this study, the social interaction between patients, relatives and SLPs were studied to analyze the clinical decisionmaking processes that are routinely used in video-based telepractice in outpatient services. The various phases of data analysis were initially carried out by MB (first author).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%