2023
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2023.1153619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Well log prediction while drilling using seismic impedance with an improved LSTM artificial neural networks

Abstract: Well log prediction while drilling estimates the rock properties ahead of drilling bits. A reliable well log prediction is able to assist reservoir engineers in updating the geological models and adjusting the drilling strategy if necessary. This is of great significance in reducing the drilling risk and saving costs. Conventional interactive integration of geophysical data and geological understanding is the primary approach to realize well log prediction while drilling. In this paper, we propose a new artifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some scholars used bidirectional stacked long short-term memory neural networks to predict soil movement [29]. Some scholars predicted hydrological data and drilling logs based on improved LSTM models [30,31]. In the field of economics, some scholars used LSTM neural networks to predict stock returns and stock price movements [32,33].…”
Section: Grey Models Neural Network Regression Models Curve-fitting M...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars used bidirectional stacked long short-term memory neural networks to predict soil movement [29]. Some scholars predicted hydrological data and drilling logs based on improved LSTM models [30,31]. In the field of economics, some scholars used LSTM neural networks to predict stock returns and stock price movements [32,33].…”
Section: Grey Models Neural Network Regression Models Curve-fitting M...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the performance of the prediction models, four performance metrics were employed, namely, Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), Mean Square Error (MSE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and Coefficient of Determination (R 2 ), were selected to evaluate the prediction accuracy (Zheng et al, 2023). The formula for performance metrics is as follows (Deng et al, 2022;Wang et al, 2023):…”
Section: Evaluation Of Performancementioning
confidence: 99%