SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition 1998
DOI: 10.2118/49046-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Well Performance and Completion Effectiveness in the Baldy Butte Field, Washakie Basin, Wyoming

Abstract: The Baldy Butte field is located in the East Washaltie subbasin of the Greater Green River Basin and is several miles east of the prolific Echo Springs/ Standard Draw Almond bar sand trend. Wells are completed in the upper 300 to 400 ft of the Almond formation (Upper Mesaverde), at a true-vertical depth of around 8000 ft. Production is wet-gas (10–14 bbl of condensate mmscf gas) and occurs from naturally fractured low-stand deltaic, marine and fluvial point-bar sand deposits. These sands are over-pressured (0.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Possible reasons for the discrepancy are limitations of fracture models 9 , limitations of the RPI model, and liquid loading of the fracture. 7 Due to the large volumes of produced water encountered, liquids in the fracture may play a significant role in the reduced effective fracture half-lengths calculated in RPI. The liquid loading may be caused by a stable liquid column present in the wellbore and extending into the fracture limiting flow capacity and effective half-length.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Possible reasons for the discrepancy are limitations of fracture models 9 , limitations of the RPI model, and liquid loading of the fracture. 7 Due to the large volumes of produced water encountered, liquids in the fracture may play a significant role in the reduced effective fracture half-lengths calculated in RPI. The liquid loading may be caused by a stable liquid column present in the wellbore and extending into the fracture limiting flow capacity and effective half-length.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RPI is a single layer, single phase simulator that utilizes a combined mass flow rate. Lithology and petrophysical characteristics vary in the J Sand reservoir however, this method has been used successfully to determine well performance in multi-layer, variable-porosity cases as demonstrated by Cramer, et al 7 Reservoir and fracture parameters were then determined for evaluation. Only wells located in the study area ( Figure 9) were included and wells with short production histories or in which only monthly production data was available were excluded from the study.…”
Section: Rpimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RPI is a single-layer, single-phase graphical production analysis method used to analyze reservoir and fracture properties (Crafton 1997;Cramer and Stallings 1998). It combines gas, oil, and water rates into one mass flow rate for analysis.…”
Section: Refracture Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…casing and consisted of 1,785 barrels of 26 pounds of gellant/1000 gallons crosslinked processed enhanced guar (PEG) based borate fluid system and 151,615 pounds of 18/40 mesh Versaprop. As compared to other guar borate systems, the PEG system allows for a lower polymer loading to be used to achieve a given level of viscosity (Cramer et al 1998). The average surface injection rate was 38 bpm and the average injection pressure was 3,679 psi.…”
Section: Refracture Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A performance study of 29 wells was conducted in 1998 and the results were chronicalled in paper SPE 49046. 24 For each well, wireline log analysis was used to assign a net pay value and hydrocarbon porosityheight product (øh) and the RPI method of production analysis was used to attempt derivation of the permeability-height product (kh), permeability (k) , effective fracture half-length (X F ) and gas-in-place (drainage area). One of the most notable findings in the paper was that the economic dominance of Company A was attributable to achieving significantly greater effective X F per well than Companies B and C, even though Company A used less fracturing fluid and proppant in their treatments (see Figure 12).…”
Section: Case Study #2mentioning
confidence: 99%