2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2019.11.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Well-posedness for a general class of differential inclusions

Abstract: We consider an abstract class of differential inclusions, which covers differentialalgebraic and non-autonomous problems as well as problems with delay. Under weak assumptions on the operators involved, we prove the well-posedness of those differential inclusions in a pure Hilbert space setting. Moreover, we study the causality of the associated solution operator. The theory is illustrated by an application to a semistatic quasilinear variant of Maxwell's equations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, A reg j, is monotone. Finally, maximality can now be shown by noting that 1 + A reg j, is surjective and invoking Theorem 1.6 from [37].…”
Section: Mixed-dimensional Poromechanical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Hence, A reg j, is monotone. Finally, maximality can now be shown by noting that 1 + A reg j, is surjective and invoking Theorem 1.6 from [37].…”
Section: Mixed-dimensional Poromechanical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Due to the flexibility of the choice of the operators M and N , which act in space-time, the problem class comprises many different types of differential equations, like delay equations, fractional differential equations, integro-differential equations and coupled problems thereof (see e.g. [18,22] for some survey in the autonomous case and [20,24,28] for some non-autonomous and/or nonlinear examples).…”
Section: Infimum Taken Over All Appropriate G Yieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 16.3.1 also has a nonlinear analogue. This can be found in [122]. For an autonomous well-posedness result for nonlinear evolutionary inclusions we also refer to Chap.…”
Section: Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%