2019
DOI: 10.3934/dcds.2019147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Well-posedness of general 1D initial boundary value problems for scalar balance laws

Abstract: We focus on the initial boundary value problem for a general scalar balance law in one space dimension. Under rather general assumptions on the flux and source functions, we prove the well-posedness of this problem and the stability of its solutions with respect to variations in the flux and in the source terms. For both results, the initial and boundary data are required to be bounded functions with bounded total variation. The existence of solutions is obtained from the convergence of a Lax-Friedrichs type a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A well-posedness theorem is presented in [17] for general IBVP posed on a finite segment. Below we adapt the result to the IBVP under Definition II.4.…”
Section: Otherwise It Is In Congested Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A well-posedness theorem is presented in [17] for general IBVP posed on a finite segment. Below we adapt the result to the IBVP under Definition II.4.…”
Section: Otherwise It Is In Congested Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of the non‐local problem is carried out exploiting the same strategy used in both [] and []. As already mentioned [], studies the non‐local IBVP where the non‐local operator is the standard convolution product, while [] considers the local problem for a balance law, i.e. a one dimensional IBVP where the flux function has the form f(t,x,ρ) and there is also a source term.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in this way the a priori estimates on the solution would be less precise than those presented in this work. Namely, a positivity result and an L1‐bound on the solution are missing in []. Moreover, the L‐estimate recovered here depends on the first derivatives of the flux function, see Theorem , while using the results of [] yields an estimate depending on the mixed second derivatives of f .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations