Wellbeing economics in public policy: A distinctive Australasian contribution?

Abstract

The ‘Wellbeing Budget’ presented to the New Zealand Parliament in 2019 was widely described as a world-first. This article explores the possibility of a distinctive Australasian contribution to our understanding of wellbeing economics in public policy. The introduction section presents an analytical wellbeing framework showing how human actions draw on services provided by the country’s capital stocks to create and sustain personal and communal wellbeing. The second section chronicles some landmark policy initiatives in Australia and New Zealand for understanding and monitoring wellbeing, culminating in the Wellbeing Budget. The third section highlights four areas for further development: (1) the role of family wellbeing in intergenerational wellbeing, (2) the role of cultural capital in providing foundations for future wellbeing, (3) the role of Indigenous worldviews in enriching understandings of wellbeing and (4) the role of market enterprise in expanding capabilities for wellbeing. These are all areas where Australasian researchers have demonstrated expertise. JEL Codes: I31, I38, B54

New Zealand books on wellbeing: a review essay

“…This essay began by citing Dalziel's (2019) suggestion there is a rich history of distinctive Australasian contributions to wellbeing economics and public policy. The books reviewed here are important contributions to that tradition.…”

“…New Zealand's 'Wellbeing Budget' in 2019 attracted considerable international attention (Anderson and Mossialos 2019). Dalziel (2019) recently suggests that the Budget, including the Treasury's Living Standards Framework that underpinned it, are part of a rich history of distinctive Australasian contributions to wellbeing economics and public policy going back to Dame Marilyn Waring's (1988) influential book, Counting for Nothing. This history includes the Ministry of Social Development's Social Report series, published annually between 2001 and 2010, with a further volume in 2016 (MSD 2016), which shares many similarities with the Living Standards Framework.…”

A Well-Being Approach to Soil Health—Insights from Aotearoa New Zealand

“…Finally, a well-being approach is important for policy analysis because people's decisions and behaviours are driven by what they think well-being is and how they aspire to achieve it [41]. This approach elevates the importance of human agency in determining the benefits people derive from ecosystem services [48,55]. Having a more holistic understanding of the benefits people value from soil, who benefits and how, would help develop more equitable soil health policies and support better decision-making.…”

Happy but Unequal: Differences in Subjective Well-Being Across Individuals and Space in Colombia

“…Since 2015 the United Kingdom's What Works Centre for Wellbeing has been collecting and disseminating information on ways to promote SWB-based policy (Frijters et al, 2020). In 2019, New Zealand's Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern expressed her preference for gauging the long-term impact of policies on people's happiness rather than relying on short-term indicators (Dalziel, 2019). Similar initiatives have started in Iceland, Scotland, and Wales.…”