2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wellbore Permeability Estimates from Vertical Interference Testing of Existing Wells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, gaps along the cement/casing interface and/or fractures in the cement matrix can significantly increase the equivalent permeability (which can reach 10 21 to 1 mD). Crow et al [2010] and Gasda et al [2013] studied the casing integrity of several wells using a Vertical Interference Test (VIT), which is a downhole test designed to measure hydraulic connection of the casing annulus over a selected well section. Their results indicate that the equivalent permeability of a casing annulus can range from 1 mD to more than 100 mD.…”
Section: 1002/2014wr016146mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, gaps along the cement/casing interface and/or fractures in the cement matrix can significantly increase the equivalent permeability (which can reach 10 21 to 1 mD). Crow et al [2010] and Gasda et al [2013] studied the casing integrity of several wells using a Vertical Interference Test (VIT), which is a downhole test designed to measure hydraulic connection of the casing annulus over a selected well section. Their results indicate that the equivalent permeability of a casing annulus can range from 1 mD to more than 100 mD.…”
Section: 1002/2014wr016146mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective permeabilities and porosities were selected in order to cover the range of values presented by Bachu and Bennion [2009], Gasda et al [2013], and Tao and Bryant [2014]. The minimum and maximum considered values are 20% and 45% for the porosity e and 10 23 to 10 3 mD for the equivalent permeability k (Table 4).…”
Section: Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is achieved using an MCMC stochastic simulation method that successively samples the parameter space with stable frequencies from a fixed probability distribution. It then tunes the proposal distribution during the evolution to the posterior target distribution using information inferred from the sampling history induced by the transitions of the Markov Chain . Data selected for the VIT analysis begins when rapid pressurization starts outside the packers on the MDT string and ends immediately if any of the following four criteria are met: Dual packer assembly (MRPA) pressure in between the packers is greater than the single‐probe assembly (MRPS) pressure outside the packers. dMRPA/dt is less than zero: MRPA is not monotonically increasing. d 2 MRPA/dt 2 greater than zero: MRPA function is not concave down. A change of more than 10% occurs in either the MRPS or MRPA gauge within a very short time. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eff ective well permeabilities have been characterized on the basis of fi eld or laboratory measurements, and also on the basis of 'soft ' information on various well characteristics such as well type, depth, age, and regulatory requirements at the time of drilling. More recent VIT measurements from nine data sets described in Gasda et al 35 and Duguid et al 36 found eff ective permeability estimates of the well barrier system to be highly variable and ranging from approximately 1 mD to over 1000 mD. VITs measure pressure drops along the outside of the well casing over intervals of several meters, which allows calculating the eff ective permeability of potential pathways along the rock-cement interface, along the casing-cement interface, and through fractures or cracks within the cement or the surrounding rock.…”
Section: Alternative Well Leakage Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%