Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
This study systematically investigates the mechanical instability of a wellbore as a function of rock mechanical properties and in-situ earth stresses, and validates the predicted failures with post-drilling problematic wells. Results from this study will help to avoid wellbore instability related issues. Extended Reach Wells (ERD) were drilled in field X through shale formations inter-bedded by unconsolidated sandstone formations and carbonate formations which experienced severe wellbore instabilities. Rock mechanics lab tests were performed on preserved core samples and all the available well logs were obtained and subsequently analyzed thoroughly to develop the rock mechanics properties profile. Daily drilling reports were analyzed and this drilling history was used to evaluate the best failure criterion for modeling purposes. Accordingly, Mogi-coulomb was found to be the most appropriate failure criterion that matches the drilling history failures with predicted failures and can be used for more accurate future wellbore problem predictions. An industrial geomechanical software was used to build a Mechanical Earth Model (MEM). The software output was calibrated and validated with the observed failed wellbore condition in selected drilled wells. Subsequently, the root causes of different wellbore instability problems were identified. After preliminary validation of the MEM, the safe mud weight window for drilling future wells was predicted with respect to each formation by providing plots for different inclinations and azimuths. The safe mud weight windows for drilling in any inclination, azimuth and measured depth for Aruma, Rumaila, Ahmadi, Safaniya, Biyadh and Buwaib were found and reported. Furthermore, the safest mud weight window that works for the entire section at any inclination, azimuth and measured depth was discovered and reported for the fisrt time. Results from this study indicate that the predicted mud weight window profile could be adopted in future drilling operations for safe problem-free drilling in problematic formations.
This study systematically investigates the mechanical instability of a wellbore as a function of rock mechanical properties and in-situ earth stresses, and validates the predicted failures with post-drilling problematic wells. Results from this study will help to avoid wellbore instability related issues. Extended Reach Wells (ERD) were drilled in field X through shale formations inter-bedded by unconsolidated sandstone formations and carbonate formations which experienced severe wellbore instabilities. Rock mechanics lab tests were performed on preserved core samples and all the available well logs were obtained and subsequently analyzed thoroughly to develop the rock mechanics properties profile. Daily drilling reports were analyzed and this drilling history was used to evaluate the best failure criterion for modeling purposes. Accordingly, Mogi-coulomb was found to be the most appropriate failure criterion that matches the drilling history failures with predicted failures and can be used for more accurate future wellbore problem predictions. An industrial geomechanical software was used to build a Mechanical Earth Model (MEM). The software output was calibrated and validated with the observed failed wellbore condition in selected drilled wells. Subsequently, the root causes of different wellbore instability problems were identified. After preliminary validation of the MEM, the safe mud weight window for drilling future wells was predicted with respect to each formation by providing plots for different inclinations and azimuths. The safe mud weight windows for drilling in any inclination, azimuth and measured depth for Aruma, Rumaila, Ahmadi, Safaniya, Biyadh and Buwaib were found and reported. Furthermore, the safest mud weight window that works for the entire section at any inclination, azimuth and measured depth was discovered and reported for the fisrt time. Results from this study indicate that the predicted mud weight window profile could be adopted in future drilling operations for safe problem-free drilling in problematic formations.
Geosteering and reservoir mapping from deep resistivity and acoustic measurements have revolutionized the drilling industry. Looking around, ahead, and aside information allows for optimal well placement in complex reservoir structures, while drilling increasingly difficult well trajectories. Downhole fluid analysis (DFA) while drilling, aka fluid mapping while drilling (FMWD), can make geosteering even more powerful by incorporating actual InSitu fluid information into landing and geosteering decisions. This paper looks at successful FMWD based well placement made in a Malaysian field. Field XYZ is a prolific oilfield with a strong gas cap and moderate water drive. The operator has planned a new greenfield campaign to boost declining production by drilling new horizontal oil producers from the existing well centers. The Late Oligocene - Miocene sandstones are well known homogenous units. However, salinity, resistivity contrast, and long transition in the swept zone become a major challenge. Active production, gas cap, aquifer movement, pressure depletion and complex porosity and permeability distribution cause uncertainties on the actual fluid contacts. Fluid typing from petrophysical measurements is inconclusive. Modelling for reservoir mapping resistivity-based measurements highlighted the challenges to land the wells in the thin oil pay zone with degrading rock quality at the bottom and uncertain OWC depth. The operator decided to drill a pilot section through the reservoir sequence to acquire critical subsurface data, identify actual fluid contacts and set the appropriate landing point. An FMWD service was integrated in the bottomhole assembly to provide a comprehensive reservoir fluid characterization. Eight (8) acquisitions have been performed. Before acquiring DFA stations the initial program called to draw fluid gradients from pretests. This method turned to be misleading and inconclusive due to limited reservoir thickness, variable permeabilities and depletion. It was changed to a more extensive DFA acquisition with less reliance on pressure-based gradients. Differential sticking is a major historical risk due to active production. A new operational workflow was engineered to mitigate this risk. Conventional long pump-outs were fragmented into a set of repeat shorter ones at same depths within a stationary time limit set by drilling. Fluid characterization was thereby safely and efficiently performed by ensuring proper control of borehole stickiness with no stuck pipe event or excessive overpull, and without compromising the formation evaluation objectives or clean-up process. Acquired fluid information in the sand sequence provided new insights of the fluid distribution and contacts, yielding increased accuracy on the landing position of the production sections, and well producibility. While still mostly perceived as an exploration/appraisal formation evaluation technique, FMWD is a powerful and disruptive geosteering solution. The combination of InSitu and while-drilling fluid, petrophysical and producibility data allows optimal positioning of wellbores, eventually yielding increased reservoir drainage.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.