Werteorientierung und Arbeitgeberwahl im Wandel der Generationen

Pfeil, Silko

doi:10.1007/978-3-658-16334-1

Cited by 44 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…"), ?Baltringen (Probst, 1877, as "Pristis sp. "), Walbertsweiler (Pfeil, 1991). Bavaria: Heigelsberger Graben near Teisendorf (Pollerspöck & Beaury, 2014).…”

Section: Centrophoridae Bleeker 1859mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Distribution in the OMM: Baden-Württemberg, South Germany: Baltringen (Probst, 1878; Sach, 2016), Ulm-Ermingen (Baier et al, 2004), Walbertsweiler (Pfeil, 1991). Switzerland: Kanton Aargau: Würenlos (Leriche, 1927b).…”

Section: Remarksmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Distribution in the OMM: Baden-Württemberg, South Germany: Baltringen(Probst, 1878;Sach, 2016), Walbertsweiler(Pfeil, 1991) Autecology: Paragaleus contains four Recent species. Members of the genus are known from the Paci c, Indian and East Atlantic Oceans.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Unfortunately, no dried jaws of the Recent relative were available, nor a detailed illustration of the complete dentition of I. oxyrhynchus. Only Bigelow & Schroeder (1948, Fig.73c) have provided a drawing of a complete dentition of I. oxyrhynchus, which was the base for our assessment of tooth positions.Other occurrences in the OMM: Baden-Württemberg: Baltringen (Probst, 1879; Sach, 2016), Walbertsweiler(Pfeil, 1991), Ulm-Ermingen(Baier et al, 2004). Bavaria: Simssee area (Villafaña et al, 2020).Autecology: The extant species lives near the bottom in the tropical Western Atlantic down to a depth of 15 m. It lives in marine and brackish waters and feeds on small schooling shes (Froese & Pauly, 2022).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The shark and ray teeth of the Lower Miocene (Upper Marine Molasse) from Ballendorf, Baden-Württemberg, Southern Germany.

Höltke

Maxwell

Bracher³

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In an abandoned sand pit near Ballendorf (Alb-Donau District, Baden-Württemberg, sediments of the Upper Marine Molasse (Lower Miocene) are present. In these sediments, 30 shark and ray genera were identified (Aetobatus, Alopias, Araloselachus, Carcharhinus, Carcharias, Centrophorus, Chaenogaleus, Dasyatis, Galeocerdo, Hemipristis, Iago, Isistius, Isogomphodon, Keasius, Notorynchus, Pachyscyllium, Paragaleus, Physogaleus, Pristiophorus, Raja, Rhinobatos, Rhinoptera, Rhizoprionodon, Rhynchobatus, Scyliorhinus, Sphyrna, Squalus, Squatina, Taeniurops, Triakis). However, in this paper we only illustrate and describe the 23 taxa not already discussed in previous publications on the Upper Marine Molasse deposits of Äpfingen, Rengetsweiler and Ursendorf, apart from two exceptions: teeth from jaw positions not previously illustrated, and specimens that are better preserved than those in the previous publications. Specimens only determined as “sp.” were illustrated because it cannot be ruled out that they represent different species to the ones published earlier. Nearly all of the taxa found have recent relatives, only Araloselachus, Keasius and Physogaleusare extinct. Most of the recovered taxa lived on or near the bottom in the shelf region. Alopias and possibly also Keasius lived higher in the water column. With Isistius, a taxon living in the oceanic realm was present, and the Recent representatives of Centrophorus live in deeper waters. Nearly all taxa fed on invertebrates and/or fishes; Isistius also fed as an ectoparasite. Additionally, two generalist feeders (Galeocerdo, Notorynchus) and one filter feeder (Keasius) were identified. The species Carcharias crassidens, which is not common in the Upper Marine Molasse, was also verified. Other fossils which were found in this deposit are remnants of odontocete cetaceans, molluscs, balanid barnacles, algae, and teeth of terrestrial mammals. The palaeoenvironment was a warm, shallow water habitat. Based on greater proximity to the palaeo-coastline, the water depth was probably less than in other Upper Marine Molasse deposits.

show abstract

“…"), ?Baltringen (Probst, 1877, as "Pristis sp. "), Walbertsweiler (Pfeil, 1991). Bavaria: Heigelsberger Graben near Teisendorf (Pollerspöck & Beaury, 2014).…”

Section: Centrophoridae Bleeker 1859mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Remarksmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The shark and ray teeth of the Lower Miocene (Upper Marine Molasse) from Ballendorf, Baden-Württemberg, Southern Germany.

Höltke

Maxwell

Bracher³

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although M. owstoni is a mostly bathyal shark (Compagno 1984), the teeth of the ancient M. lineata have also been found in neritic deposits as mentioned above. The species possibly came in search for food to shallower waters or the sharks followed schools of fishes (Pfeil 1991). However, Compagno (1984) stated that the extant species rarely occurs in shallow water close inshore.…”

Section: Extinct Neogene Shark Speciesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review of the Palaeobiology of Some Neogene Sharks and the Fossil Record of Extant Shark Species

Höltke,

Maxwell,

Rasser

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the last years, new findings and new methods (stable isotopes of oxygen, zinc and nitrogen, 2D and 3D modelling, geometric morphometric analyses of the teeth) have enhanced our knowledge of the Neogene shark fauna and its palaeobiology. Several papers deal with the large Otodus (Megselachus) species, including the construction of a 3D model as well as insights into lifestyle and diet. In addition, skeletal remains of Carcharias gustrowensis, Carcharodon hastalis, Keasius parvus and a natural tooth set of Carcharodon hubbelli have been described in the last 13 years, and the dentition of the Neogene species Carcharoides catticus, Megachasma applegatei and Parotodus benedenii have been reconstructed. Stable isotope analyses of the teeth from the Neogene species of Araloselachus, Carcharias, Carcharodon, Galeocerdo, Hemipristris, and Mitsukurina have given insights into the trophic position of these genera during the Neogene, and shark teeth preserved near skeletal remains of prey animals (mammals) and shark bite traces on these remains provide direct evidence of trophic interactions. Tooth shape, fossil locality and palaeoenvironment have been used to better understand the taxa Carcharhinus dicelmai, Megalolamna paradoxodon, Pachyscyllium dachiardii and P. distans. Among extant species, Galeorhinus galeus can be traced back to the Eocene. The following taxa can be traced back to the Oligocene: ?Alopias superciliosus, and Rhincodon typus. Species already present in the Miocene include: Alopias vulpinus, Carcharhinus amblyrhynchoides, C. amblyrhynchos, C. albimarginatus, C. amboinensis, C. brachyurus, C. brevipinna, C. falciformis, C. glaucus, C. leucas, C. limbatus, C. longimanus, C. macloti, C. obscurus, C. perezi, C. sealei, ?Carcharodon carcharias, Centrophorus granulosus, Cetorhinus maximus, Dalatias licha, Deania calcea, Galeocerdo cuvier, , Glyphis glyphis, Heptranchias perlo, Isurus paucus, Lamna nasus, Negaprion brevirostris, Odontaspis ferox, Pseudocarcharias kamoharai, Sphyrna media, S. mokarran. First appearing in the Pliocene are: Scymnodon ringens, Somniosus rostratus, Zameus squamulosus. For some extant species (Carcharias taurus, Hexanchus griseus, Isurus oxyrinchus, Notorynchus cepedianus, Sphyrna zygaena) it is not clear if the assigned Neogene teeth represent the same species. Applying these new methods to more fossil shark taxa, a detailed search for shark fossils, as well as better knowledge of the dentition of extant species (especially those with minute-sized teeth) will further enhance knowledge of the evolution and palaeobiology of sharks.

show abstract