West Hollywood as Symbol: The Significance of Place in the Construction of a Gay Identity

Abstract

The 1984 municipal incorporation of West Hollywood, California offers an opportunity to explore two related themes: (1) the role of place in the creation of identity generally, and (2) the role of place in the creation of sexual identity in particular. Work on the second subject has largely concentrated on the political economy of gay territories, although there has been an ongoing concern with the symbolic importance of these places. Although these studies have provided valuable insights on these themes, they do not reflect the renewed concern in humanistic geography with the normative importance of place, and the study of morally valued ways of life. These latter topics provide alternative avenues into questions of identity. In the coverage of the incorporation campaign, the gay press presented an idealized image of the city. In defining a new gay identity, the gay press utilized the holistic quality of place to weave together the ‘natural’ and cultural elements of West Hollywood. This idealized ‘gay city’ united the place's real and imagined physical attributes with social and personal characteristics of gay men. More simply, the qualities of the city itself expressed intellectual and moral virtues, such that characterizations of the city became part of a narrative defining the meaning of ‘gay’. This new gay male identity included seven elements: creativity, aesthetic sensibility, an orientation toward entertainment or consumption, progressiveness, responsibility, maturity, and centrality. The effort to create an identity centered on West Hollywood was relatively conservative in the sense that it was not a fundamental challenge to existing social and political systems. Rather, it reflected a strategy based on an ethnicity model, seeking to ‘demarginalize’ gays and to bring them closer to the symbolic ‘center’ of US society.

Las motivaciones de los turistas LGBT en la elección de la ciudad de Barcelona

“…Otros, como Forest (1995), Visser (2002), Fernández Salinas (2007, Hughes (2006), Wall y Mathieson (2006) y Monterrubio (2008), han analizado los efectos reales y potenciales de este turismo en las comunidades receptoras.…”

“…El espacio desempeña un papel fundamental en la creación de la identidad sexual (Forest, 1995;Cooper. 2010) y aunque algunos autores defienden la globalización del turismo homosexual y la «desestigmatización» de ciertos destinos turísticos (Oswin, 2006), tradicionalmente el turista LGBT ha elegido dos grandes tipos de destinos: los de sol y playa y las grandes ciudades.…”

Shifting Boundaries of Sexual Identities in Cape Town: The Appropriation and Malleability of ‘Gay’ in Township Spaces

“…It will further explore these in relation to the types of social spaces these men today use and the way these spaces go towards both affecting these identities and are also affected by them. While much has been written about the reciprocal links between sexual identity and space in predominantly Western environments (see for example Aldrich 2004;Bell and Binnie 2004;Binnie 1995;Binnie and Valentine 1999;Chisholm 2005;Forest 1995;Knopp 1992Knopp , 1997Knopp , 1998Phillips 2004;Quilley 1997), there is still a relative dearth of material on the way 'non-Western' environments are both shaped by and go towards shaping forms of sexual identity. 1 This is especially important in the context of South Africa for two key reasons.…”

Queer Methods and Methodologies

“…Classical research in geographical studies of gender, sexuality and space considered newly emergent gay and lesbian spaces in urban areas including the distinctive downtown residential and commercial neighbourhoods that support gay and lesbian political, social and economic life (Castells 1983, lauria and Knopp 1985, Valentine 1993, Forest 1995, Rothenberg 1995, Nash 2001, Podmore 2001. while trenchant critique has been directed at the arguably essentialist nature of these projects and for such projects' disregard for difference and for their failing to be reflexive about the political work such historiographies do, this research nevertheless brought questions of spatial marginalisation, resistance and subversion onto the academic agenda (Penn 1995, Bravmann 1997, Kirsch 2000.…”