2001
DOI: 10.7771/1481-4374.1137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Western Culture and the Ambiguous Legacies of the Pig

Abstract: Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, and the Critical and Cultural Studies Commons Dedicated to the dissemination of scholarly and professional information, Purdue University Press selects, develops, and distributes quality resources in several key subject areas for which its parent university is famous, including business, technology, health, veterinary medicine, and other selected disciplines in the humanities and sciences. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, the peer-reviewed, full-text, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gee (2011) in a similar manner maintains that "words and phrases take on much more specific meaning in actual contexts of use" (p.23). The word "pig", for example, does not connote negative meaning in some Western societies thanks to "a recognition of the unique position of the pig in Judeo-Christian Western culture" (Komins, 2001, p.9) but receive a derogatory perception in Indonesian context where Islamic values play a vital role in creating the cultural perception that the animal is prohibited to eat, and one would commit a sin if breaking the rule (Nurpadillah, 2017). The 'pig' word tells us that a word can bring a potential level of taboo from which a negative connotation is derived (Leach, 1964), and this negative value is then translated as a 'label' in a society.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Analysis Bidirectional Investment Of Meanimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gee (2011) in a similar manner maintains that "words and phrases take on much more specific meaning in actual contexts of use" (p.23). The word "pig", for example, does not connote negative meaning in some Western societies thanks to "a recognition of the unique position of the pig in Judeo-Christian Western culture" (Komins, 2001, p.9) but receive a derogatory perception in Indonesian context where Islamic values play a vital role in creating the cultural perception that the animal is prohibited to eat, and one would commit a sin if breaking the rule (Nurpadillah, 2017). The 'pig' word tells us that a word can bring a potential level of taboo from which a negative connotation is derived (Leach, 1964), and this negative value is then translated as a 'label' in a society.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Analysis Bidirectional Investment Of Meanimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43 Thus, the pig also served as the symbolic analogy of scapegoated groups and demonized 'Others' and, in Medieval tradition, primarily Jews. 44 The carnival tradition of burning or hanging an effigy (in earlier carnivalesque traditions even killing the mock-king) is the conclusive act of achieving social inversion. 45 It is notable, however, that the real subaltern in the context of carnival remains subaltern.…”
Section: What Is Carnival?mentioning
confidence: 99%