2021
DOI: 10.1007/s13164-021-00586-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Western Skeptic vs Indian Realist. Cross-Cultural Differences in Zebra Case Intuitions

Abstract: The cross-cultural differences in epistemic intuitions reported by Weinberg, Nichols and Stich (2001; hereafter: WNS) laid the ground for the negative program of experimental philosophy. However, most of WNS’s findings were not corroborated in further studies. The exception here is the study concerning purported differences between Westerners and Indians in knowledge ascriptions concerning the Zebra Case, which was never properly replicated. Our study replicates the above-mentioned experiment on a considerably… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 51 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given cross‐cultural variation, then, what we get are claims about what justice is, or what consciousness is, according to mostly WEIRD thinkers. Do your conceptual analysis in non‐WEIRD places, taking seriously non‐WEIRD intuitions, and you'll get a different set of results (e.g., Stich & Machery, 2023; Sękowski et al., 2023).…”
Section: Paleoanthropological Philosophymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given cross‐cultural variation, then, what we get are claims about what justice is, or what consciousness is, according to mostly WEIRD thinkers. Do your conceptual analysis in non‐WEIRD places, taking seriously non‐WEIRD intuitions, and you'll get a different set of results (e.g., Stich & Machery, 2023; Sękowski et al., 2023).…”
Section: Paleoanthropological Philosophymentioning
confidence: 99%