2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevresearch.2.013331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wet and dry internal friction can be measured with the Jarzynski equality

Abstract: The existence of two types of internal friction-wet and dry-is revisited, and a simple protocol is proposed for distinguishing between the two types and extracting the appropriate internal friction coefficient. The scheme requires repeatedly stretching a polymer molecule, and measuring the average work dissipated in the process by applying the Jarzynski equality. The internal friction coefficient is then estimated from the average dissipated work in the extrapolated limit of zero solvent viscosity. The validit… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…one from the difference in energies of the configurations associated with the positioning of different residues near or far from each other [72] which is accounted for by internal friction in polymer chains [73] and another from the net effect of the active forcing experienced by the particle. In this case the MFPT can be useful to describe the looping time of a polymer in an active bath [74].…”
Section: Influence Of Additional Ruggedness In Active Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…one from the difference in energies of the configurations associated with the positioning of different residues near or far from each other [72] which is accounted for by internal friction in polymer chains [73] and another from the net effect of the active forcing experienced by the particle. In this case the MFPT can be useful to describe the looping time of a polymer in an active bath [74].…”
Section: Influence Of Additional Ruggedness In Active Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrodynamic interactions have been successfully incorporated over the past several decades in computational studies of polymer solution dynamics in the dilute concentration regime, both by methods that treat the solvent explicitly, such as nonequilibrium molecular dynamics (NEMD) [31][32][33][34][35], and by Brownian dynamics (BD) simulations [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51]. In BD, solvent degrees of freedom are eliminated completely and their effect is taken into account through long-range dynamic correlations in the stochastic displacements of the beads.…”
Section: Brownian Dynamics Of Associative Polymer Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, however, the JE has been used to compute not only free-energy differences but also dissipative work. For example, internal friction was studied using a simple spring-dashpot model of a polymer [19] and the JE. In the next section we detail some aspects of the JE for calculation of free-energy curves ∆A(z) for interaction surfaces including dissipative work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%