1999
DOI: 10.1006/jcat.1999.2422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wet Oxidation of Phenol on Ce1−xCuxO2−δCatalyst

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
88
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
88
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During the last years considerable research efforts were focused on reducing unwanted catalyst deactivation. Stable supported catalysts with high activity towards oxidation of organic pollutants have been successfully synthesised and tested in the oxidation of phenol [66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78]. These new catalysts remain, however, relatively expensive materials and the search for cheap, active and stable CWAO catalysts continues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last years considerable research efforts were focused on reducing unwanted catalyst deactivation. Stable supported catalysts with high activity towards oxidation of organic pollutants have been successfully synthesised and tested in the oxidation of phenol [66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78]. These new catalysts remain, however, relatively expensive materials and the search for cheap, active and stable CWAO catalysts continues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of Cu(NO 3 ) 2 solution added was calculated to yield a final 10, 15 and 20 mol% CuO in the obtained mixed oxide samples. A more detailed preparation procedure is described elsewhere (Hočevar et al, 1999). Numbers 10, 15 and 20, when referring to CuO-CeO 2 catalysts, denote the nominal mole fraction of CuO present in those samples, while the number behind it represents the calcination temperature.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Cuo-ceo 2 Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amongst the various approaches proposed, the catalytic wet oxidation (CWO) with air represents nowadays one of the most promising technologies to attain an effective degradation of many classes of noxious and refractory pollutants [1][2][3]. Using mostly phenol [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] and acetic acid [1,2,21] as model compounds, it has been ascertained that noble metal catalysts feature an outstanding CWO performance, though undergoing relevant deactivation phenomena mainly induced by strong adsorption of carbonaceous deposits (fouling/poisoning) [1,2]. Moreover, also in the perspective of finding out less costly alternatives to precious metal catalysts, a rising scientific concern has been progressively forwarded onto transition metal oxide systems, getting a suitable CWO activity of Cu [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]21] and Mn [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, also in the perspective of finding out less costly alternatives to precious metal catalysts, a rising scientific concern has been progressively forwarded onto transition metal oxide systems, getting a suitable CWO activity of Cu [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]21] and Mn [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] based systems towards several substrates under relatively mild reaction conditions. Nevertheless, leaching and/or fouling deactivation phenomena remain still the main drawbacks to overcome for a successful commercial application of the CWO technology [1][2][3][9][10][11][12][14][15][16][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%