2011
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-011-9800-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wet packing of blended fine and coarse aggregate

Abstract: All codified methods for measuring the packing density of aggregate are carried out under dry condition. However, these dry packing methods do not account for the effect of water in the concrete mix. In a previous study, a wet packing method for measuring the packing density of fine aggregate under wet condition has been developed and it was found that the packing density of fine aggregate can be substantially higher under wet condition than dry condition. Nevertheless, many researchers still believe that for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the final optimum MFF of 39.2% is smaller than the MFF of 44% measured by the conventional dry packing density method. This phenomenon resembles the wet packing density method; in fact, the MFF calculated by the wet density method is around 5% smaller than the one measured by the dry density method [25]. Therefore, the concrete mix design obtained from the modified packing density method can produce a similar effect of the wet packing density method and is more realistic.…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the final optimum MFF of 39.2% is smaller than the MFF of 44% measured by the conventional dry packing density method. This phenomenon resembles the wet packing density method; in fact, the MFF calculated by the wet density method is around 5% smaller than the one measured by the dry density method [25]. Therefore, the concrete mix design obtained from the modified packing density method can produce a similar effect of the wet packing density method and is more realistic.…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Since there is not much powder in the coarse aggregate, the proportion of the coarse aggregate can still be determined by the conventional packing density method. As the packing density correlates positively with the bulk density [25], the bulk density is measured for the proportion selection in place of the packing density from now on.…”
Section: Modified Packing Density Methods For the Crfa Concrete MIX Dementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other samples can be explained by the Krieger-Dougherty equation, which is also valid for the mixed sample case. Measurement of wet packing, contrary to the dry packing adopted in this study, is expected to decrease the difference because the hydrodynamic properties of grains are not consistent when they are floating in a suspended medium (Kwan et al 2012). Additionally, as a possible factor, the chemical admixtures used in this research are affected by changing packing density under wet conditions, which induces errors between predicted viscosity and dry packing density.…”
Section: Rheology Of the Mortar Samplesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The wet packing test developed by the authors' research team [35] was used to measure the packing density of the aggregate particles. Basically, the aggregate was added with water and the bulk density of the water-solid mixture measured, from which the solid concentration of the aggregate particles was calculated.…”
Section: Aggregate Packing Density Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%