2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wet-spun PVDF nanofiber separator for direct fabrication of coaxial fiber-shaped supercapacitors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy density reported in this study is larger than most of previously reported FSSs, including supercapacitors based on CNT/MnO 2 and CNT/PPy fibers (18.88 μWh cm –2 ), coaxial graphene fibers (17.50 μWh cm –2 ), graphene/WS 2 fibers (16.86 μWh cm –2 ), graphene/MoS 2 fibers (14.67 μW h cm –2 ), Pt/CNT@PANI yarn (12.68 μWh cm –2 ), CF/Ni/Co fibers (9.57 μWh cm –2 ), rGO/conductive polymer fibers (4.55 μWh cm –2 ), CNT/rGO composite fiber (3.80 μWh cm –2 ), CF/MnO 2 and CF/MoO 3 fibers (2.70 μWh cm –2 ), and CNT/MnO 2 fibers (1.14 μWh cm –2 ) . Meantime, it performs comparably to the FSS based on coaxial graphene fibers (30.8 μWh cm –2 ) . Also, the cyclic stability of fabricated FSS was assessed by GCD tests.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The energy density reported in this study is larger than most of previously reported FSSs, including supercapacitors based on CNT/MnO 2 and CNT/PPy fibers (18.88 μWh cm –2 ), coaxial graphene fibers (17.50 μWh cm –2 ), graphene/WS 2 fibers (16.86 μWh cm –2 ), graphene/MoS 2 fibers (14.67 μW h cm –2 ), Pt/CNT@PANI yarn (12.68 μWh cm –2 ), CF/Ni/Co fibers (9.57 μWh cm –2 ), rGO/conductive polymer fibers (4.55 μWh cm –2 ), CNT/rGO composite fiber (3.80 μWh cm –2 ), CF/MnO 2 and CF/MoO 3 fibers (2.70 μWh cm –2 ), and CNT/MnO 2 fibers (1.14 μWh cm –2 ) . Meantime, it performs comparably to the FSS based on coaxial graphene fibers (30.8 μWh cm –2 ) . Also, the cyclic stability of fabricated FSS was assessed by GCD tests.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…40 Meantime, it performs comparably to the FSS based on coaxial graphene fibers (30.8 μWh cm −2 ). 41 Also, the cyclic stability of fabricated FSS was assessed by GCD tests. As shown in Figure S3, the FSS has a capacitance retention of 83% after 5000 cycles at the current density of 0.76 mA cm −2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) combines the advantages of fluorinated compound and polymeric resins, exhibit excellent mechanical properties, chemical corrosion resistance, high temperature resistance and good electrolyte wettability [5,6]. For instance, the melting point of PVDF is about 160 °C and can be used in the temperature range of − 40 ~ 150 °C.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…%). 54 10 wt.% of PVDF was found to be the ideal concentration in the separator. Though the separator displayed a highly wrinkled network architecture, it favoured large contact between electrode/ electrolyte and rapid diffusion of electrolyte ions with minimum risk of a short circuit.…”
Section: Polymer Based Membranesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Coaxial wet spinning is one such process which was used to fabricate PVDF nanofiber separators whose thickness was controlled by regulating the PVDF content (5 wt% to 30 wt%). 54 10 wt% of PVDF was found to be the ideal concentration in the separator. Though the separator displayed a highly wrinkled network architecture, it favoured a large contact between the electrode/electrolyte and rapid diffusion of electrolyte ions with a minimum risk of a short circuit.…”
Section: Materials For Separator Membranesmentioning
confidence: 94%