2013
DOI: 10.2352/j.imagingsci.technol.2013.57.3.030503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wettability and Aging of Polymer Substrates after Atmospheric Dielectrical Barrier Discharge Plasma on Demand Treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For both untreated PC and AP10‐PC, the decoupling of C1s scans (Figure 3(c),(d), left) only showed one peak (C‐O) associated with O at ~286.3 eV, the peak for C=O (or carbonate O– C=O) at 288–289 eV was absent. The absence of C=O peak for untreated PC had been documented in other studies, 46–48 potentially due to the sharing of electron clouds between carbon atoms linked to oxygen in C‐O and C=O (or O‐C=O) within the PC chains. In addition to an increased O content, the C1s scan of UVO‐PC (Figure 3(e), left) had two distinct peaks, 286.3 eV (for C‐O) and 289.2 eV (for C=O and/or O‐C=O), with the latter probably attributed to the carboxylate species, either in the PC chains or from the chemisorbed CO 2 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For both untreated PC and AP10‐PC, the decoupling of C1s scans (Figure 3(c),(d), left) only showed one peak (C‐O) associated with O at ~286.3 eV, the peak for C=O (or carbonate O– C=O) at 288–289 eV was absent. The absence of C=O peak for untreated PC had been documented in other studies, 46–48 potentially due to the sharing of electron clouds between carbon atoms linked to oxygen in C‐O and C=O (or O‐C=O) within the PC chains. In addition to an increased O content, the C1s scan of UVO‐PC (Figure 3(e), left) had two distinct peaks, 286.3 eV (for C‐O) and 289.2 eV (for C=O and/or O‐C=O), with the latter probably attributed to the carboxylate species, either in the PC chains or from the chemisorbed CO 2 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…In order to understand how the oxidation extent of PC affects the interactions between PC and pNIPAAm, the Flory‐Huggins interaction parameter ( χ ) and the interaction energy of mixing (Δ G mix ) between pNIPAAm and various oxidized states of PC were estimated 46,48,49 . Based on earlier studies, 43 while plasma treatment penetrated relatively deep (>200 nm) for pure PC, the molecular weight reduction of plasma treated PC was minimum (dropped from ~40 kg/mol to ~30 kg/mol after 1 h of oxygen plasma treatment).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Opposed to polymers predominantly crystalline, which have a more rigid structure and have a lower aging rate, amorphous polymers have greater mobility in their polymeric chains and are more likely to aging effect. After some time of storage, hydrophilicity of the plasma treated films is reduced due to the reorientation of functional groups formed on the surface toward bulk material and the diffusion of these groups on the polymeric matrix 63,64 .…”
Section: Water Contact Angle (Wca)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymer films have been frequently used in many modern industrial applications owing to their high performance. In the area of printed electronics, polymeric materials such as polycarbonate (PC), polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and other films are used as a substrate material for the manufacture of organic light-emitting diodes, sensor applications and organic solar cells [ 1 , 2 ] due to their outstanding flexibility, transparency, fold resistance, tensile strength and chemical and corrosion resistance, low weight and lower cost [ 3 ]. The manufacture of printed flexible electronics often requires changing the surface of the polymer to improve adhesion or wetting [ 4 , 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A different group of authors assessed the influence of plasma treatment on different types of substrates and materials as reported below. Van Dogen et al in [ 1 ] studied the influence of plasma treatment on polyethylene naphthalate (PEN), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polycarbonate (PC), fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP) and polyimide (PI) polymer films and highlighted increased wetting behavior after the treatment due to an increase in the polar part of the surface energy. Azimet et al in [ 20 ] studied the influence of DBD plasma treatment on polypropylene (PP) films and showed that the treatment conducted to a decrease in the contact angle while the surface roughness increased with the treatment time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%